Abstract
Abstract
Background
Previous studies have indicated that the majority of cases with “failed” results related to transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) test have the normal hearing. The present study aimed to assess the possible relationships between perinatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.
Methods
A case-control study was carried out in an Iranian Hospital in 2020. Based on the OAE results on the first day of life, newborns were divided into 2 groups; Control group included subjects with “Pass” OAE results. Every neonate with “Fail” OAE result was referred for auditory brainstem response (ABR). Neonates with bilateral fail OAE but normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were considered as the case group. All recorded data were analyzed to assess the possible correlations between maternal/neonatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.
Results
One hundred and eighty-one neonates entered the study. Of all included neonates, 87 (48.1%) cases showed bilateral fail OAE and 94 (51.9%) subjects passed the OAE test. Normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were observed in all cases with bilateral fail OAE. Comparisons of variables affecting the OAE results showed that of all perinatal factors, neonate’s sex (p = 0.046) and cesarean section (p = 0.003) were the only influencing factors that increased the risk of false-positive OAE results.
Conclusion
Based on the results, the cesarean section delivery and neonate’s male sex increased the risk of false-positive results related to OAE test. Implementing other screening tests such as ABR or Automated ABR as the initial screening test could be suggested for such cases.
Funder
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference20 articles.
1. Valse D, Nagarathna HK. Efficacy of TEOAEs and BERA as screening tools for deafness in newborn. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(3):491–5.
2. Qi B, Cheng X, En H, Liu B, Peng S, Zhen Y, Cai Z, Huang L, Zhang L, Han D. Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:116.
3. Crouch E, Probst J, Bennett K. Evaluating loss to follow-up in newborn hearing Screeningin a southern state. JEHDI. 2017;2(1):40–7.
4. Yousefi J, Ajalloueyan M, S Amirsalari S, Hassanali Fard M. The specificity and sensitivity of transient Otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in Tehran hospitals. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):199–204.
5. Poulakis Z, Barker M, Wake M. Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:20–4.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献