Detention of children and adolescents under mental health legislation: a scoping review of prevalence, risk factors, and legal frameworks

Author:

Schölin LisaORCID,Tucker Zack,Chopra ArunORCID,Borschmann RohanORCID,McKay Colin

Abstract

Abstract Background For individuals with severe mental illness, involuntary assessment and/or treatment (hereafter detention) can be a necessary intervention to support recovery and may even be lifesaving. Despite this, little is known about how often these interventions are used for children and adolescents. Methods This global scoping review set out to: (1) map the current evidence around mental health detentions of children and adolescents (< 18 years); (2) identify the clinical, sociodemographic, and behavioural factors associated with detention; and (3) document the views of professionals and young people on the implementation of mental health legislation. Results After searching databases of peer-reviewed literature and citation chaining, 42 articles from 15 jurisdictions were included. About one fifth of psychiatric admissions in national register data were detentions, however trends were only available for a few high-income Western countries. The circumstances justifying detention and the criteria authorising detention varied between studies, with a mix of clinical factors and observed behaviours reported as the reason(s) warranting/precipitating a detention. Particular groups were more likely to experience detention, such as children and adolescents from minority ethnic communities and those with a documented history of abuse. There was a notable absence of qualitative research exploring the views of professionals or children and adolescents on detention. Conclusion Further research is needed to explore the impact of detention on those aged < 18 years, including national register-based studies and qualitative studies. This is particularly relevant in nations currently undergoing legislative reform.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference76 articles.

1. Council of E. European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg; 1953.

2. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High C. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI). 1966.

3. UN General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2007;A/RES/61/1.

4. Sheridan Rains L, Zenina T, Dias MC, Jones R, Jeffreys S, Branthonne-Foster S, et al. Variations in patterns of involuntary hospitalisation and in legal frameworks: an international comparative study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):403–17.

5. Wessely S, Gilbert S, Hedley M, Neuberger J. Modernising the Mental Health Act: Increasing Choice, Reducing Compulsion 2018 [Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modernising-the-mental-health-act-final-report-from-the-independent-review.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3