Author:
Alvear-Vasquez Fernando,Vidal-Espinoza Rubén,Gomez-Campos Rossana,de Campos Luis Felipe Castelli Correia,Lazari Evandro,Guzmán-Luján Jose Francisco,Pablos-Monzó Ana,Cossio-Bolaños Marco
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Generally, Body surface area (BSA) changes significantly during growth and maturation. These increases portend a possible relationship between body size as determined by BSA with maturational status in children and adolescents.
Objective
To determine the relationship between maturity status (MS) obtained by non-invasive anthropometric methods and body surface area (BSA) in children and adolescents of both sexes in a regional population of Chile. Additionally, we sought to verify the type of linear or nonlinear relationship between MS and BSA in both sexes.
Methods
A descriptive (cross-sectional) study was designed in 950 children and adolescents of both sexes (539 males and 411 females). The age range ranged from 6.0 to 17.9 years. Anthropometric measurements were evaluated: body weight, standing height, sitting height. MS was assessed by means of two non-invasive anthropometric techniques. Both techniques predict peak years of growth velocity (APHV) through a regression equation for each sex. BSA (m2) was estimated by means of the Haycock equation.
Results
The R2 in the linear model is relatively lower (R2 = 0.80 to 0.89 in males and 0.74 to 0.66 in females) in relation to the nonlinear quadratic model (R2 = 0.81 in males and 0.76 to 0.69). The quadratic nonlinear quadratic model reflected an adequate fit (RMSE) for the data set, being in men (RMSE = 1.080 and 1.125), while in women (RMSE = 1.779 and 1.479).
Conclusion
BSA is positively associated with MS determined by two non-invasive methods in Chilean children and adolescents: The nonlinear quadratic model was a better fit to the data distribution. The results suggest the use of BSA as a possible predictor of maturity status in Chilean youth.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference38 articles.
1. Cameron N, Bogin B. Human Growth and Development. Second edition ed. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Science; 2012.
2. Beunen GP, Rogol AD, Malina RM. Indicators of Biological Maturation and secular changes in Biological Maturation. FoodNutr Bull. 2006;27(4suppl5):244–S256.
3. Gillison F, Cumming S, Standage M, Barnaby C, Katzmarzyk P. Assessing the impact of adjusting for maturity in weight status classification in a cross-sectional sample of UK children. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e015769.
4. Kozieł SM, Malina RM. Validation in independent longitudinal samples of Boys and Girls. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):221–36.
5. Cossio-Bolaños M, Vidal-Espinoza R, Castelli Correia de Campos LF, Sulla-Torres J, Cossio-Bolaños W, Urra Albornoz C, et al. Equations predicting maturity status: validation in a cross-sectional sample to assess physical growth and body adiposity in chilean children and adolescents. Endocrinología diabetes y nutrición. 2021;68(10):689–98.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献