Author:
Ouma Simple,Abbo Catherine,Natala Nakita,McCoy Molly,Kroupina Maria
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Female sex workers (FSWs) live and work in high-risk environments, experience high levels of adversity, and have multigenerational trauma that can negatively affect their children. Yet not much is known about the prevalence of victimization (i.e., exposure to maltreatment and trauma) among children of FSWs. This study compared the prevalence of lifetime victimization among adolescents of FSWs and adolescents of non-FSWs in Gulu City, Northern Uganda.
Methods
A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among adolescents (10–17 years) enrolled in the Children of At-Risk Parents (CARP) study. This study included 147 adolescents of FSWs and 147 adolescents of non-FSWs selected for comparison in Gulu City, Northern Uganda. The adolescents of FSWs were identified through their mothers using respondent-driven sampling. Data on the residence of FSWs guided a proportionate stratified sampling of adolescents of non-FSWs. Using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire, we screened for 34 different types of victimization during participants’ lifetimes. Percentage point differences within groups of adolescents and comparison between adolescents of FSWs and non-FSWs were calculated using STATA version 14.1. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05.
Results
99.3% of the participants experienced at least one form of lifetime victimization. The median number of lifetime victimizations was 12.4. Overall, lifetime victimization was higher among adolescents of FSWs than non-FSWs (13.4 vs. 11.5), male vs. female adolescents (13.4 vs. 11.9), and older [14–17 years] vs. younger (10–13 years) adolescents (14.0 vs. 11.7). Further, more adolescents of FSWs experienced lifetime victimization in the following domains and subdomains, all of which were statistically significant: kidnap (15.8% vs. 4.8%), emotional abuse (65.8% vs. 50.0%), emotional neglect (37.4% vs. 21.1%), physical intimidation (10.2% vs. 4.1%), relational aggression (36.4% vs. 18.4%), verbal aggression (68.7% vs. 46.9%), sexual victimization (31.3% vs. 17.7%), verbal sexual harassment (20.4% vs. 5.4%), exposure to murder scene (42.9% vs. 26.5%), witness to domestic violence (39.5% vs. 26.5%), and witness to the murder of relatives (31.3% vs. 21.1%). Conversely, more adolescents of non-FSWs experienced caregiver victimization than the adolescents of FSWs (98.0 vs. 92.5; p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Childhood victimization is highly prevalent in Northern Uganda and disproportionately affects the adolescents of FSWs. Therefore, government and development partners should urgently develop policies and interventions targeting prevention, early detection, and timely management of victimization in this vulnerable population.
Funder
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Fogarty International Center (FIC), United States
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference65 articles.
1. Van Der Kolk BA (2007) The developmental impact of childhood trauma. In: Kirmayer LJ, Lemelson R, Barad M (eds) Understanding trauma: integrating biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Cambridge University, p. 224–241
2. Zlotnick C, Zakriski AL, Shea MT, Costello E, Begin A, Pearlstein T et al. The long-term sequelae of sexual abuse: Support for a complex posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 1996 Jan 1;9(2):195–205.
3. Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abus Negl. 2003;27:169–90.
4. Hamby SL, Finkelhor D, Ormrod R, Turner H, Hamby SL, Finkelhor D, et al. The Juvenile victimization questionnaire (JVQ): Administration and Scoring Manual. Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center; 2004.
5. Benjet C, Bromet E, Karam EG, Kessler RC, Mclaughlin KA, Ruscio AM, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: results from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Psychol Med. 2016;46(2):327–43.