Abstract
AbstractThe social, physical, financial, natural, and human dimensions within slaughterhouses have taken a central position in diversifying livelihoods among pastoralists in the arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) in Kenya. There is a need to expound on the literature about these dimensions and assess how they impact on livelihood strategies and outcomes. This research aimed to bring out how these dimensions impact livelihood strategies among Kenyan pastoralists using the sustainable livelihood approach. Qualitative data was collected from four counties in Kenya’s ASALs predominantly inhabited by pastoralists, using focus group discussions, and narratives Observations were analysed using the RQDA package within the R statistical computing environment. The results revealed increasingly diversified social-economic activities, value addition of slaughter by-products, better rangeland management, and diversified diets. Gender, age, and roles significantly (P < 0.01) influenced the extent of diversification. Diversified social-economic activities and value addition directly impacted food security through increased utilization of slaughter by-products, provision of an alternative livelihood source, and better resilience during calamities. To conclude, social, economic, and human activities were central in diversified and advanced pastoral livelihoods.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference47 articles.
1. Alinovi L, D’Errico M, Mane E, Romano D, 2010. Livelihoods strategies and household resilience to food insecurity: An empirical analysis to Kenya, in: Mobilising European research for development policies. Dakar: European Union and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations., pp. 1–52. http://www.technicalconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Livelihoods-Strategies_Household-Res.pdf.
2. Anderson, M.D.C. 2015. The role of knowledge in building food security resilience across food system domains. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5: 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0311-3.
3. Ansah, I.G.K., C. Gardebroek, and R. Ihle. 2019. Resilience and household food security: A review of concepts, methodological approaches and empirical evidence. Food Security 11: 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00968-1.
4. Bhattacharya, J., J. Currie, and S. Haider. 2004. Poverty, food insecurity, and nutritional outcomes in children and adults. Journal of Health Economics 23: 839–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.12.008.
5. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献