Abstract
AbstractThe article explores and discusses findings from historical, geographical and anthropological research arguing that not simply a capitalist outlook but a footing in the state was crucial to the emergence and development of ranching. It develops the proposition that during a frontier phase, ranching evolved as a social, economic and ecological system of livestock keeping that was predicated on and exploited a duality of structures with the confining state on one side and the open range on the other, both separated and connected by a frontier. This is what makes ranching historically different from pastoralism despite superficial similarities. As pastoralism is increasingly connected to markets, capitalism and society at large, developing properties typically known from ranching, the article makes a case for taking a closer look at historical ranching in order to study transforming pastoral societies of the presence.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference75 articles.
1. Amaral, Samuel. 1998. The rise of capitalism on the Pampas. The Estancias of Buenos Aires, 1785-1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barfield, Thomas J. 1981. The Central Asian Arabs of Afghanistan. Pastoral nomadism in transition. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bassi, Marco. 2005. Decisions in the shade. Political and juridical processes among the Oromo-Borana. Trenton: Red Sea.
4. Behnke, Roy. 2018. Open access and the sovereign commons: A political ecology of pastoral land tenure. Land Use Policy 76: 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.054.
5. Behnke, Roy H., and Ian Scoones. 1993. Rethinking range ecology: Implications for rangeland management in Africa. In Range ecology at disequilibrium. New models of natural variability and pastoral adaptation in African savannas, ed. Roy H. Behnke, Ian Scoones, and Carol Kerven, 1–30. London: Overseas Development Institute.