Abstract
AbstractRecent years have witnessed signs of increasing political instability in democratic countries as well as growing alienation from civic institutions and processes among citizens, especially among young people. Within the context of civic and citizenship education, it is important to review such phenomena and study their extent among young people as well as the factors that have the potential of promoting different forms of citizenship engagement. Using data from the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) 2016 and 2009, this article provides insights into the expectations of young people to actively engage as citizens in the future and what influences these expectations, with a primary focus on the role of civic knowledge and trust in civic institutions.Results from ICCS 2009 and 2016 show that while large majorities among young people expected to vote in elections, only relatively few found it likely to be more actively involved in political action. Except for engagement in illegal protest, young people’s expected participation in general appeared to be positively related to trust. However, associations with civic knowledge were more differentiated. Trust and civic knowledge tended to have negative correlations in countries with higher levels of perceived corruption, while a different association became apparent in democracies with more transparent institutions. Civic knowledge was consistently positively related to anticipated voting while it was negatively related to expected illegal protest. More knowledgeable students were also less inclined to consider active (conventional) forms of political participation in the future.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Bachen, C., Raphael, C., Lynn, K., McKee, C., & Philippi, J. (2008). Civic engagement pedagogy and information technology on web sites for youth. Political Communication 25(3) 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197525
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. H. Freeman and Company.
3. Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (Eds.). (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. SAGE Publications.
4. Boogards, M. (2017). Lessons from Brexit and Trump: Populism is what happens when political parties lose control. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 11(4), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-017-0352-y
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587