Author:
Ali Haneen,Ahmed Abdulaziz,Olivos Carlos,Khamis Khaled,Liu Jia
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Urinary incontinence (UI) is the inability to completely control the process of releasing urine. UI presents a social, medical, and mental issue with financial consequences.
Objective
This paper proposes a framework based on machine learning for predicting urination time, which can benefit people with various degrees of UI.
Method
A total of 850 data points were self-recorded by 51 participants to investigate how different factors impact urination time. The participants were instructed to record input data (such as the time of consumption and the number of drinks) and output data (i.e., the time the individual urinated). Other factors, such as age and BMI, were also considered. The study was conducted in two phases: (1) data was prepared for modeling, including missing values, data encoding, and scaling; and (2) a classification model was designed with four output classes of the next urination time: < = 30 min, 31–60 min, 61–90 min, > 90 min. The model was built in two steps: (1) feature selection and (2) model training and testing. Feature selection methods such as lasso regression, decision tree, random forest, and chi-square were used to select the best features, which were then used to train an extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm model to predict the class of the next urination time.
Result
The feature selection steps resulted in nine features considered the most important features affecting UI. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of the XGB predictive model are 0.70, 0.73, 0.70, and 0.71, respectively.
Conclusion
This research is the first step in developing a machine learning model to predict when a person will need to urinate. A precise predictive instrument can enable healthcare providers and caregivers to assist people with various forms of UI in reliable, prompted voiding. The insights from this predictive model can allow future apps to go beyond current UI-related apps by predicting the time of urination using the most relevant factors that impact voiding frequency.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference32 articles.
1. Loohuis AMM, Wessels NJ, Dekker JH, van Merode NAM, Slieker-ten Hove MCP, Kollen BJ, Berger MY, van der Worp H, Blanker MH. App-Based treatment in primary care for urinary incontinence: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19:102–9.
2. Subak L, Van Den Eeden S, Thom D, Creasman JM, Brown JS, R.R. for Incontinence Study at Kaiser (RRISK) Research Group, et al. Urinary incontinence in women: direct costs of routine care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:596-e1.
3. Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, Luc K-O, Subak LL. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:398–406.
4. Gorina Y, Schappert SM, Bercovitz A, Elgaddal N, Kramarow EA. Prevalence of incontinence among older Americans (2014).
5. Aoki Y, Brown HW, Brubaker L, Cornu JN, Daly JO, Cartwright R. Urinary incontinence in women. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:1–20.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献