Validation of a computerized decision support system to review pharmacotherapy treatment: scheduling guidelines

Author:

Zapelini Clávison MartinelliORCID,Galato DayaniORCID,Alano Graziela ModolonORCID,de Carvalho Martins Karina SaviattoORCID,Trauthman Silvana CristinaORCID,Soares AlessandraORCID,Schuelter-Trevisol FabianaORCID,Trevisol Daisson JoséORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background The review of pharmacotherapy can be conceptualized as a service in which the drugs used by the patient are reviewed to control the risks as well as to improve the results of the drug therapy, detecting, solving, and preventing issues associated with the drug, readjusting the doses and times (schedule) so that the treatment is not incompatible or in duplicity. Methods The aim of the study was to validate an intelligent information system, which was developed to assist the scheduling activity in the pharmacotherapy review. The system used the concept of Genetic Algorithms. To validate the system, hypothetical cases were elaborated considering various aspects of pharmacotherapy such as underdose, overdose, drug interactions and contraindications. These cases were tested in the system and were also analyzed by pharmaceutical experts with clinical and research experience in the pharmacotherapy review process. The degree of agreement between the assessments of the appointments carried out by the pharmaceutical specialists and by the system were measured using the Kappa index with a 95% confidence interval. Results In detecting errors and make propositions, the system was able to identify 80% of errors, with pharmaceutical experts identifying between 20 and 70% of errors. In relation the results of kappa between the cases, the system had 87,3% of concordance, whereas the best pharmaceutical expert had 75,5% of concordance, considering the correct answer. Conclusion It can be concluded that with the methodology used, the investigation met the objectives and confirmed the system is effective for pharmaceutical review process. There are indications that the system can help in the Pharmacotherapy review process, being able to find prescription errors as well as to establish times for the use of medications according to the patient’s routine.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications

Reference21 articles.

1. Chambers P. Rational use of medicines. Rev Rec. 2011;169(9):226–7.

2. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos. Uso Racional de Medicamentos: temas relacionados. Interações de medicamentos. Volume 2016. Brasília, 2012. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/uso_racional_medicamentos_temas_selecionados.pdf (acesso em 15/12/2020). Page 13/13

3. Soares AS, Trevisol DJ, Schuelter-Trevisol F. Medication discrepancies in a hospital in Southern Brazil: the importance of medication reconciliation for patient safety. Braz J Pharmac Sci. 2021;57: e18064.

4. Geurts MME, Talsma J, Brouwers JRBJ, Gier JJ. Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the pacient: a systematic review. Br J Clin Phamacol. 2012;74(1):16–33.

5. Rozenfeld S, Giordani F, Coelho S. Eventos adversos a medicamentos em hospital terciário: estudo piloto com rastreadores. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47(6):1102–11.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3