Author:
Hall Justin N.,Galaev Ron,Gavrilov Marina,Mondoux Shawn
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Healthcare is increasingly digitized, yet remote and automated machine learning (ML) triage prediction systems for virtual urgent care use remain limited. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is the gold standard triage tool for in-person care in Canada. The current work describes the development of a ML-based acuity score modelled after the CTAS system.
Methods
The ML-based acuity score model was developed using 2,460,109 de-identified patient-level encounter records from three large healthcare organizations (Ontario, Canada). Data included presenting complaint, clinical modifiers, age, sex, and self-reported pain. 2,041,987 records were high acuity (CTAS 1–3) and 416,870 records were low acuity (CTAS 4–5). Five models were trained: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, gradient boosting regressor, and neural net. The outcome variable of interest was the acuity score predicted by the ML system compared to the CTAS score assigned by the triage nurse.
Results
Gradient boosting regressor demonstrated the greatest prediction accuracy. This final model was tuned toward up triaging to minimize patient risk if adopted into the clinical context. The algorithm predicted the same score in 47.4% of cases, and the same or more acute score in 95.0% of cases.
Conclusions
The ML algorithm shows reasonable predictive accuracy and high predictive safety and was developed using the largest dataset of its kind to date. Future work will involve conducting a pilot study to validate and prospectively assess reliability of the ML algorithm to assign acuity scores remotely.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference42 articles.
1. Canada Health Infoway. Report on Digital Health: Canadians embracing Digital Health. Ottawa: Canada Health Infoway; 2015. https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/resources/reports/2815-infographic-report-on-digital-health-canadians-embracing-digital-health
2. CMA. What Canadians Think About Virtual Care, Ottawa. CMA; 2020. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/virtual-care/cma-virtual-care-public-poll-june-2020-e.pdf
3. Hamm JM, Greene C, Sweeney M, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department in the era of COVID-19: front-line experience from 2 institutions. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1(6):1630–6.
4. Zachrison KS, Boggs KM, Hayden EM, Espinola JA, Carmago CA Jr. Understanding barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(3):392–9.
5. Atkinson P, McGeorge K, Innes G. Saving emergency medicine: is less more? CJEM. 2022;24(1):9–11.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献