Author:
Xue Kaiwen,Li Weihao,Liu Fang,Liu Xiangxiang,Wong John,Zhou Mingchao,Cai Chunli,Long Jianjun,Li Jiehui,Zhang Zeyu,Hou Weilin,Nie Guohui,Wang Yulong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Longshi Scale is a pictorial assessment tool for evaluating activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with stroke. The paper-based version presents challenges; thus, the WeChat version was created to enhance accessibility. Herein, we aimed to validate the inter-rater and test–retest reliabilities of the WeChat version of the Longshi Scale and explore its potential clinical applications.
Methods
We recruited 115 patients with stroke in the study. The ADL results of each patient were assessed using both the WeChat and paper-based version of the Longshi Scale; each evaluation was conducted by 28 health professionals and 115 caregivers separately. To explore the test–retest reliability of the WeChat version, 22 patients were randomly selected and re-evaluated by health professionals using the WeChat version. All evaluation criteria were recorded, and all evaluators were surveyed to indicate their preference between the two versions.
Results
Consistency between WeChat and the paper-based Longshi Scale was high for ADL scores by health professionals (ICC2,1 = 0.803–0.988) and caregivers (ICC2,1 = 0.845–0.983), as well as for degrees of disability (κw = 0.870 by professionals; κw = 0.800 by caregivers). Bland–Altman analysis showed no significant discrepancies. The WeChat version exhibited good test–retest reliability (κw = 0.880). The WeChat version showed similar inter-rater reliability in terms of the ADL score evaluated using the paper-based version (ICC2,1 = 0.781–0.941). The time to complete assessments did not differ significantly, although the WeChat version had a shorter information entry time (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: –43.463 to –15.488). Health professionals favored the WeChat version (53.6%), whereas caregivers had no significant preference.
Conclusions
The WeChat version of the Longshi Scale is reliable and serves as a suitable alternative for health professionals and caregivers to assess ADL levels in patients with stroke. The WeChat version of the Longshi Scale is considered user-friendly by health professionals, although it is not preferred by caregivers.
Trial registration
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second People’s Hospital of Shenzhen (approval number: 20210812003-FS01) and registered on the Clinical Trial Register Center website: clinicaltrials.gov on January 31, 2022 (registration no.: NCT05214638).
Funder
Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Wang Y, Guo S, Zheng J, Wang QM, Zhang Y, Liang Z, et al. User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1479–91.
2. Wang Y, Li S, Pan W, Xiao P, Zhang J, Wang Q-M, et al. Evaluation of the disability assessment Longshi scale: a multicenter study. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520934299.
3. Assessment of self-care abilities in daily life for persons with disability. China: National Standards Committee and Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). pp. 1–11.
4. Bunce A, Middendorf M, Hoopes M, Donovan J, Gold R. Designing and implementing an electronic health record-embedded card study in primary care: methods and considerations. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20:348–52.
5. Ryan JM, Corry JR, Attewell R, Smithson MJ. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:19–26.