Author:
Xu Xiaowei,Qin Lu,Ding Lingling,Wang Chunjuan,Wang Meng,Li Zixiao,Li Jiao
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Medical imaging reports play an important role in communication of diagnostic information between radiologists and clinicians. Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports can provide evidence that is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic stroke. The high-signal regions of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) images in MRI reports are key evidence. Correctly identifying high-signal regions of DWI images is helpful for the treatment of ischaemic stroke patients. Since most of the multiple signals recorded in head MRI reports appear in the same part, it is challenging to identify high-signal regions of DWI images from MRI reports.
Methods
We developed a deep learning model to automatically identify high-signal regions of DWI images from head MRI reports. We proposed a fine-grained entity typing model based on machine reading comprehension that transformed the traditional two-step fine-grained entity typing task into a question-answering task.
Results
To prove the validity of the model proposed, we compared it with the fine-grained entity typing model, of which the F1 measure was 5.9% and 3.2% higher than the F1 measures of the models based on LSTM and BERT, respectively.
Conclusion
In this study, we explore the automatic identification of high-signal regions of DWI images from the description part of a head MRI report. We transformed the identification of high-signal regions of DWI images to an FET task and proposed an MRC-FET model. Compared with the traditional two-step FET method, the model we proposed not only simplifies the task but also has better performance. The comparable result shows that the work in this study can contribute to improving the clinical decision support system.
Funder
Beijing Natural Science Foundation
CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference30 articles.
1. McDonald RJ, Schwartz KM, Eckel LJ, et al. The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(9):1191–8.
2. Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(12):938–46.
3. Altaf F, Islam SM, Akhtar N, et al. Going deep in medical image analysis: Concepts, methods, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access. 2019;7:99540–72.
4. Taghanaki SA, Abhishek K, Cohen JP, et al. Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2020; 1–42.
5. Morris SA, Slesnick TC. Magnetic resonance imaging. Visual Guide to Neonatal Cardiology. 2018; 104–108.