Abstract
Abstract
Background
Previously, we introduced our Patient Health Information Dialogue Ontology (PHIDO) that manages the dialogue and contextual information of the session between an agent and a health consumer. In this study, we take the next step and introduce the Conversational Ontology Operator (COO), the software engine harnessing PHIDO. We also developed a question-answering subsystem called Frankenstein Ontology Question-Answering for User-centric Systems (FOQUS) to support the dialogue interaction.
Methods
We tested both the dialogue engine and the question-answering system using application-based competency questions and questions furnished from our previous Wizard of OZ simulation trials.
Results
Our results revealed that the dialogue engine is able to perform the core tasks of communicating health information and conversational flow. Inter-rater agreement and accuracy scores among four reviewers indicated perceived, acceptable responses to the questions asked by participants from the simulation studies, yet the composition of the responses was deemed mediocre by our evaluators.
Conclusions
Overall, we present some preliminary evidence of a functioning ontology-based system to manage dialogue and consumer questions. Future plans for this work will involve deploying this system in a speech-enabled agent to assess its usage with potential health consumer users.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference39 articles.
1. Litman D, Rosé C, Forbes-Riley K, VanLehn K, Bhembe D, Silliman S. Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2006; 16(2):145–70.
2. Damianos L, Loehr D, Burke C, Hansen S, Viszmeg M. The msiia experiment: Using speech to enhance human performance on a cognitive task. Int J Speech Technol. 2003; 6(2):133–44.
3. Harris S, Biermann A. Mouse selection versus voice selection of menu items. Int J Speech Technol. 2002; 5(4):389–402.
4. Gilkey M, Calo W, Moss J, Shah P, Marciniak M, Brewer N. Provider communication and HPV vaccination: The impact of recommendation quality. Vaccine. 2016; 34(9):1187–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.023.
5. Rimer B, Harper H, Witte O. Accelerating hpv vaccine uptake: urgency action to prevent cancer; a report to the president of the united states from the president’s cancer panel. National Cancer Institute. 2014. https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/Advisory/pcp/annualReports/HPV/PDF/PCP_Annual_Report_2012-2013.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2020.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献