A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: considerations from the European ITFoC consortium
-
Published:2021-10-02
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6947
-
Container-title:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Author:
Tsopra RosyORCID, Fernandez Xose, Luchinat Claudio, Alberghina Lilia, Lehrach Hans, Vanoni Marco, Dreher Felix, Sezerman O.Ugur, Cuggia Marc, de Tayrac Marie, Miklasevics Edvins, Itu Lucian Mihai, Geanta Marius, Ogilvie Lesley, Godey Florence, Boldisor Cristian Nicolae, Campillo-Gimenez Boris, Cioroboiu Cosmina, Ciusdel Costin Florian, Coman Simona, Hijano Cubelos Oliver, Itu Alina, Lange Bodo, Le Gallo Matthieu, Lespagnol Alexandra, Mauri Giancarlo, Soykam H.Okan, Rance Bastien, Turano Paola, Tenori Leonardo, Vignoli Alessia, Wierling Christoph, Benhabiles Nora, Burgun Anita
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform our healthcare systems significantly. New AI technologies based on machine learning approaches should play a key role in clinical decision-making in the future. However, their implementation in health care settings remains limited, mostly due to a lack of robust validation procedures. There is a need to develop reliable assessment frameworks for the clinical validation of AI. We present here an approach for assessing AI for predicting treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), using real-world data and molecular -omics data from clinical data warehouses and biobanks.
Methods
The European “ITFoC (Information Technology for the Future Of Cancer)” consortium designed a framework for the clinical validation of AI technologies for predicting treatment response in oncology.
Results
This framework is based on seven key steps specifying: (1) the intended use of AI, (2) the target population, (3) the timing of AI evaluation, (4) the datasets used for evaluation, (5) the procedures used for ensuring data safety (including data quality, privacy and security), (6) the metrics used for measuring performance, and (7) the procedures used to ensure that the AI is explainable. This framework forms the basis of a validation platform that we are building for the “ITFoC Challenge”. This community-wide competition will make it possible to assess and compare AI algorithms for predicting the response to TNBC treatments with external real-world datasets.
Conclusions
The predictive performance and safety of AI technologies must be assessed in a robust, unbiased and transparent manner before their implementation in healthcare settings. We believe that the consideration of the ITFoC consortium will contribute to the safe transfer and implementation of AI in clinical settings, in the context of precision oncology and personalized care.
Funder
This work was supported by the ITFoC project (Information Technology for the Future of Cancer) – FLAG-ERA support.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference66 articles.
1. Paton C, Kobayashi S. An open science approach to artificial intelligence in healthcare. Yearb Med Inform. 2019;28:47–51. 2. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:94–8. 3. Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–10. 4. Abràmoff MD, Lavin PT, Birch M, Shah N, Folk JC. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:39. 5. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–8.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|