Author:
Stojchevska Marija,Steenwinckel Bram,Van Der Donckt Jonas,De Brouwer Mathias,Goris Annelies,De Turck Filip,Van Hoecke Sofie,Ongenae Femke
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Insomnia, eating disorders, heart problems and even strokes are just some of the illnesses that reveal the negative impact of stress overload on health and well-being. Early detection of stress is therefore of utmost importance. Whereas the gold-standard for detecting stress is by means of questionnaires, more recent work uses wearable sensors to find continuous and qualitative physical markers of stress. As some physiological stress responses, e.g. increased heart rate or sweating and chills, might also occur when doing sports, a more profound approach is needed for stress detection than purely considering physiological data.
Methods
In this paper, we analyse the added value of context information during stress detection from wearable data. We do so by comparing the performance of models trained purely on physiological data and models trained on physiological and context data. We consider the user’s activity and hours of sleep as context information, where we compare the influence of user-given context versus machine learning derived context.
Results
Context-aware models reach higher accuracy and lower standard deviations in comparison to the baseline (physiological) models. We also observe higher accuracy and improved weighted F1 score when incorporating machine learning predicted, instead of user-given, activities as context information.
Conclusions
In this paper we show that considering context information when performing stress detection from wearables leads to better performance. We also show that it is possible to move away from human labeling and rely only on the wearables for both physiology and context.
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference55 articles.
1. Selye H. Stress and the general adaptation syndrome. BMJ. 1950;1(4667):1383.
2. Stress HWM. Campaign Guide: Managing stress and psychosocial risks at work. OSHA, European Agency for Safety Health at Work; 2013.
3. Salleh MR. Life event, stress and illness. Malays J Med Sci. 2008;15(4):9.
4. for Safety, E.A., at Work, H.: The cost of work-related stress to business and key warning signs infographic poster [online]. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2015.
5. Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo V, Scribano ML, Berto E, Luzi C, Andreoli A. Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(1):19–32.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献