Using machine learning to develop a clinical prediction model for SSRI-associated bleeding: a feasibility study

Author:

Goyal Jatin,Ng Ding QuanORCID,Zhang Kevin,Chan Alexandre,Lee Joyce,Zheng Kai,Hurley-Kim Keri,Nguyen Lee,He Lu,Nguyen Megan,McBane Sarah,Li Wei,Cadiz Christine LuuORCID

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Adverse drug events (ADEs) are associated with poor outcomes and increased costs but may be prevented with prediction tools. With the National Institute of Health All of Us (AoU) database, we employed machine learning (ML) to predict selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-associated bleeding. Methods The AoU program, beginning in 05/2018, continues to recruit ≥ 18 years old individuals across the United States. Participants completed surveys and consented to contribute electronic health record (EHR) for research. Using the EHR, we determined participants who were exposed to SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, vortioxetine). Features (n = 88) were selected with clinicians’ input and comprised sociodemographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, and medication use information. We identified bleeding events with validated EHR algorithms and applied logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boost to predict bleeding during SSRI exposure. We assessed model performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistic (AUC) and defined clinically significant features as resulting in > 0.01 decline in AUC after removal from the model, in three of four ML models. Results There were 10,362 participants exposed to SSRIs, with 9.6% experiencing a bleeding event during SSRI exposure. For each SSRI, performance across all four ML models was relatively consistent. AUCs from the best models ranged 0.632–0.698. Clinically significant features included health literacy for escitalopram, and bleeding history and socioeconomic status for all SSRIs. Conclusions We demonstrated feasibility of predicting ADEs using ML. Incorporating genomic features and drug interactions with deep learning models may improve ADE prediction.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications

Reference53 articles.

1. Santo L, Okeyode T. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2018 National Summary Tables. Published 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs_summary/2018-namcs-web-tables-508.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2022.

2. Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013–2014. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316(20):2115–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16201.

3. Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(Suppl 1):S73. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.120957.

4. Weiss AJ, Freeman WJ, Heslin KC, Barrett ML. Statistical Brief #234: Adverse Drug Events in U.S. Hospitals, 2010 Versus 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Published 2018. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb234-Adverse-Drug-Events.jsp. Accessed July 14, 2022.

5. Aspden P, Wolcott J, Bootman JL, Cronenwett L, eds; Institute of Medicine, Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2007. ISBN 0309101476.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3