Author:
Park Cheol Ho,Hong Soon Jun,Kim Sung Gyun,Shin Seok Joon,Kim Dong Ki,Lee Jung Pyo,Han Sang Youb,Lee Sangho,Won Jong Chul,Kang Young Sun,Park Jongha,Han Byoung-Geun,Na Ki-Ryang,Hur Kyu Yeon,Kim Yong-Jin,Park Sungha,Yoo Tae-Hyun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The target blood pressure (BP) value is unclear for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of strict BP control or ‘on treatment’ BP on clinical outcomes in patients with DKD.
Methods
A post-hoc analysis of the prespecified secondary outcomes of the FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial, a randomized multicenter double-blind phase III trial. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 19 years with DKD. We assigned 341 participants with DKD to BP control strategy (standard-systolic BP [SBP] < 140 mmHg versus strict-SBP < 130 mmHg). The outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events and renal events. Separate analyses were performed to compared the risk of outcome according to achieved average BP levels.
Results
A total of 341 participants were included in the analysis. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, cardiovascular/renal events were observed in 25 (7.3%) participants. Mean (SD) SBPs in the standard and strict BP control group were 140.2 (11.6) and 140.2 (11.9) mmHg, respectively. The strict BP control group did not show significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.60–2.92]). In the post-hoc analyses using achieved BP, achieved average SBP of 130–139 mmHg resulted in reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03–0.67) compared to achieved average SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, whereas further reduction in achieved average SBP < 130 mmHg did not impart additional benefits.
Conclusion
In patients with DKD, targeting a SBP of less than 130 mmHg, as compared with less than 140 mmHg, did not reduce the rate of a composite of cardiovascular and renal events. Achieved SBP of 130–139 mmHg was associated with a decreased risk for the primary outcome in patients with DKD.
Trial registration
ClinicalTirals.gov Identifier: NCT02620306, registered December 3, 2015.
(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02620306).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, et al. A Randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16.
2. Cheung AK, Rahman M, Reboussin DM, Craven TE, Greene T, Kimmel PL, et al. Effects of intensive BP control in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(9):2812–23.
3. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Blood Pressure Working Group. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2021;99(3S):S1–87.
4. Mann JFE, Chang TI, Cushman WC, Furth SL, Ix JH, Hou FF, et al. Commentary on the KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in CKD. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021;23(9):132.
5. Carriazo S, Sarafidis P, Ferro CJ, Ortiz A. Blood pressure targets in CKD 2021: the never-ending guidelines debacle. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15(5):845–51.