Author:
Youmbi Laetitia M.,Makong Yves S. D.,Mbaveng Armelle T.,Tankeo Simplice B.,Fotso Ghislain W.,Ndjakou Bruno L.,Wansi Jean D.,Beng Veronique P.,Sewald Norbert,Ngadjui Bonaventure T.,Efferth Thomas,Kuete Victor
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cancer remains a global health concern and constitutes an important barrier to increasing life expectancy. Malignant cells rapidly develop drug resistance leading to many clinical therapeutic failures. The importance of medicinal plants as an alternative to classical drug discovery to fight cancer is well known. Brucea antidysenterica is an African medicinal plant traditionally used to treat cancer, dysentery, malaria, diarrhea, stomach aches, helminthic infections, fever, and asthma. The present work was designed to identify the cytotoxic constituents of Brucea antidysenterica on a broad range of cancer cell lines and to demonstrate the mode of induction of apoptosis of the most active samples.
Methods
Seven phytochemicals were isolated from the leaves (BAL) and stem (BAS) extract of Brucea antidysenterica by column chromatography and structurally elucidated using spectroscopic techniques. The antiproliferative effects of the crude extracts and compounds against 9 human cancer cell lines were evaluated by the resazurin reduction assay (RRA). The activity in cell lines was assessed by the Caspase-Glo assay. The cell cycle distribution, apoptosis via propidium iodide (PI) staining, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) through 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1) staining, and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) via 2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluoresceine diacetate (H2DCFH-DA) staining, were investigated by flow cytometry.
Results
Phytochemical studies of the botanicals (BAL and BAS) led to the isolation of seven compounds. BAL and its constituents 3, (3-(3-Methyl-1-oxo-2-butenyl))1H indole (1) and hydnocarpin (2), as well as the reference compound, doxorubicin, had antiproliferative activity against 9 cancer cell lines. The IC50 values varied from 17.42 µg/mL (against CCRF-CEM leukemia cells) to 38.70 µg/mL (against HCT116 p53−/− colon adenocarcinoma cells) for BAL, from 19.11 µM (against CCRF-CEM cells) to 47.50 µM (against MDA-MB-231-BCRP adenocarcinoma cells) for compound 1, and from 4.07 µM (against MDA-MB-231-pcDNA cells) to 11.44 µM (against HCT116 p53+/+ cells) for compound 2. Interestingly, hypersensitivity of resistant cancer cells to compound 2 was also observed. BAL and hydnocarpin induced apoptosis in CCRF-CEM cells mediated by caspase activation, the alteration of MMP, and increased ROS levels.
Conclusion
BAL and its constituents, mostly compound 2, are potential antiproliferative products from Brucea antidysenterica. Other studies will be necessary in the perspective of the discovery of new antiproliferative agents to fight against resistance to anticancer drugs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine
Reference72 articles.
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F: Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2020, Available 17 May 2022: https://gco.iarc.fr/today.
2. Gottesman MM. Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:615–27.
3. Zeino M, Saeed ME, Kadioglu O, Efferth T. The ability of molecular docking to unravel the controversy and challenges related to P-glycoprotein-a well-known, yet poorly understood drug transporter. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(4):618–25.
4. Volm M, Efferth T. Prediction of cancer drug resistance and implications for personalized medicine. Front Oncol. 2015;5:282.
5. Wang T, Jiang X, Ruan Y, Zhuang J, Yin Y. Based on network pharmacology and in vitro experiments to prove the effective inhibition of myocardial fibrosis by Buyang Huanwu decoction. Bioengineered. 2022;13(5):13767–83.