Abstract
AbstractThe initial stability after implantology is paramount to the survival of the dental implant, and the surface roughness of the implant plays a vital role in this regard. The characterisation of surface topography is a complicated branch of metrology, with a huge range of parameters available. Each parameter contributes significantly towards the survival and mechanical properties of three-dimensional printed specimens. The purpose of this paper is to experimentally investigate the effect of surface roughness of three-dimensional printed dental implants and three-dimensional printed dogbone tensile samples under areal height parameters, amplitude parameters (average of ordinates), skewness parameters and mechanical properties. During the experiment, roughness values were analysed, and the results showed that the skewness parameter demonstrated a minimum value of 0.59%. The three-dimensional printed dental implant recorded the arithmetic mean deviation of the assessed profile with a 3.4-mm diameter at 43.23% and the three-dimensional printed dental implant with a 4.3-mm diameter at 26.18%. Samples with a complex geometry exhibited a higher roughness surface, which was the greatest difficulty of additive manufacturing when evaluating surface finish. The results show that when the ultimate tensile stress decreases from 968.35 to 955.25 MPa, the arithmetic mean deviation increases by 1.4%, and when ultimate tensile stress increases to 961.18 MPa, the arithmetic mean deviation increases by 0.6%. When the cycle decreases from 262,142 to 137,433, the arithmetic mean deviation shows that less than a 90.74% increase in the cycle is obtained. For the three-dimensional printed dental implants, the higher the surface roughness, the lower the mechanical properties, ultimately leading to decreased implant life and poor performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference39 articles.
1. Ahsan, M. M. (2016). 3D printing and titanium alloys: a paper review. Eur Acad Res, III(10), 11144–11154.
2. Barman, A., & Das, M. (2018). Nano-finishing of bio-titanium alloy to generate different surface morphologies by changing magnetorheological polishing fluid compositions. Precis Eng, 51, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.003.
3. Becker, T., van Rooyen, M., & Dimitrov, D. (2015a). Heat treatment of TI-64L-4V produced by lasercuring. South Afr J Ind Eng, 26(2), 93–103.
4. Becker, T. H., Beck, M., & Scheffer, C. (2015b). Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V. South Afr J Ind Eng, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7166/26-1-1022.
5. Bernhardt, A., Schneider, J., Schroeder, A., Papadopoulous, K., Lopez, E., Brückner, F., & Botzenhart, U. (2021). Surface conditioning of additively manufactured titanium implants and its influence on materials properties and in vitro biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C, 119, 111631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111631.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献