Abstract
AbstractThe driving forces behind cryptoassets’ price dynamics are often perceived as being dominated by speculative factors and inherent bubble-bust episodes. Fundamental components are believed to have a weak, if any, role in the price-formation process. This study examines five cryptoassets with different backgrounds, namely Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, XRP, and Dogecoin between 2016 and 2022. It utilizes the cusp catastrophe model to connect the fundamental and speculative drivers with possible price bifurcation characteristics of market collapse events. The findings show that the price and return dynamics of all the studied assets, except for Dogecoin, emerge from complex interactions between fundamental and speculative components, including episodes of price bifurcations. Bitcoin shows the strongest fundamentals, with on-chain activity and economic factors driving the fundamental part of the dynamics. Investor attention and off-chain activity drive the speculative component for all studied assets. Among the fundamental drivers, the analyzed cryptoassets present their coin-specific factors, which can be tracked to their protocol specifics and are economically sound.
Funder
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Finance
Reference89 articles.
1. Adcock R, Gradojevic N (2019) Non-fundamental, non-parametric Bitcoin forecasting. Physica A 531:121727
2. Alessandri G, Perinelli E, De Longis E, Theodorou A (2018) Second-order growth mixture modeling in organizational psychology: an application in the study of job performance using the cusp catastrophe model. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 22(1):53–76
3. Alexander C, Dakos M (2020) A critical investigation of cryptocurrency data and analysis. Quant Finance 20(2):173–188
4. Atsalakis GS, Atsalaki IG, Pasiouras F, Zopounidis C (2019) Bitcoin price forecasting with neuro-fuzzy techniques. Eur J Oper Res 276(2):770–780
5. Balcilar M, Bouri E, Gupta R, Roubaud D (2017) Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach. Econ Model 64:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.019
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献