Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to fill the gap in the literature by specifically investigating the impact of country risk on the credit risk of the banking sectors operating in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS), emerging countries. More specifically, we explore whether the country-specific risks, namely financial, economic, and political risks significantly impact the BRICS banking sectors’ non-performing loans and also probe which risk has the most outstanding effect on credit risk. To do so, we perform panel data analysis using the quantile estimation approach covering the period 2004–2020. The empirical results reveal that the country risk significantly leads to increasing the banking sector’s credit risk and this effect is prominent in the banking sector of countries with a higher degree of non-performing loans (Q.25 = − 0.105, Q.50 = − 0.131, Q.75 = − 0.153, Q.95 = − 0.175). Furthermore, the results underscore that an emerging country’s political, economic, and financial instabilities are strongly associated with increasing the banking sector’s credit risk and a rise in political risk in particular has the most positive prominent impact on the banking sector of countries with a higher degree of non-performing loans (Q.25 = − 0.122, Q.50 = − 0.141, Q.75 = − 0.163, Q.95 = − 0.172). Moreover, the results suggest that, in addition to the banking sector-specific determinants, credit risk is significantly impacted by the financial market development, lending interest rate, and global risk. The results are robust and have significant policy suggestions for many policymakers, bank executives, researchers, and analysts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Finance
Reference89 articles.
1. Abid L, Ouertani MN, Zouari-Ghorbel S (2014) Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of household’s non-performing loans in Tunisia: a dynamic panel data. Procedia Econ Finance 13:58–68
2. Adebola SS, Wan Yusoff WSB, Dahalan J (2011) An ARDL approach to the determinants of nonperforming loans in Islamic banking system in Malaysia. Kuwait Chapter Arab J Bus Manag Rev 33(830):1–11
3. Akkoc S, Vatansever K (2013) Fuzzy performance evaluation with AHP and Topsis methods: evidence from turkish banking sector after the global financial crisis. Eurasian J Bus Econ 6(11):53–74
4. Ali A, Hajja Y, Iqbal-Hussain H (2015) Impact of credit risk (NPLs) and capital on liquidity risk of Malaysian banks. In: Proceedings of the international conference on accounting studies (ICAS). pp 17–20
5. Anastasiou D, Bragoudakis Z, Malandrakis I (2019) Non-performing loans, governance indicators and systemic liquidity risk: evidence from Greece. Int J Financ Econ 24(1):97–112