Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath
-
Published:2009-09-29
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2407
-
Container-title:BMC Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Cancer
Author:
Bajtarevic Amel,Ager Clemens,Pienz Martin,Klieber Martin,Schwarz Konrad,Ligor Magdalena,Ligor Tomasz,Filipiak Wojciech,Denz Hubert,Fiegl Michael,Hilbe Wolfgang,Weiss Wolfgang,Lukas Peter,Jamnig Herbert,Hackl Martin,Haidenberger Alfred,Buszewski Bogusław,Miekisch Wolfram,Schubert Jochen,Amann Anton
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in Europe and the western world. At present, diagnosis of lung cancer very often happens late in the course of the disease since inexpensive, non-invasive and sufficiently sensitive and specific screening methods are not available. Even though the CT diagnostic methods are good, it must be assured that "screening benefit outweighs risk, across all individuals screened, not only those with lung cancer". An early non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer would improve prognosis and enlarge treatment options. Analysis of exhaled breath would be an ideal diagnostic method, since it is non-invasive and totally painless.
Methods
Exhaled breath and inhaled room air samples were analyzed using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and solid phase microextraction with subsequent gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GCMS). For the PTR-MS measurements, 220 lung cancer patients and 441 healthy volunteers were recruited. For the GCMS measurements, we collected samples from 65 lung cancer patients and 31 healthy volunteers. Lung cancer patients were in different disease stages and under treatment with different regimes. Mixed expiratory and indoor air samples were collected in Tedlar bags, and either analyzed directly by PTR-MS or transferred to glass vials and analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). Only those measurements of compounds were considered, which showed at least a 15% higher concentration in exhaled breath than in indoor air. Compounds related to smoking behavior such as acetonitrile and benzene were not used to differentiate between lung cancer patients and healthy volunteers.
Results
Isoprene, acetone and methanol are compounds appearing in everybody's exhaled breath. These three main compounds of exhaled breath show slightly lower concentrations in lung cancer patients as compared to healthy volunteers (p < 0.01 for isoprene and acetone, p = 0.011 for methanol; PTR-MS measurements). A comparison of the GCMS-results of 65 lung cancer patients with those of 31 healthy volunteers revealed differences in concentration for more than 50 compounds. Sensitivity for detection of lung cancer patients based on presence of (one of) 4 different compounds not arising in exhaled breath of healthy volunteers was 52% with a specificity of 100%. Using 15 (or 21) different compounds for distinction, sensitivity was 71% (80%) with a specificity of 100%. Potential marker compounds are alcohols, aldehydes, ketones and hydrocarbons.
Conclusion
GCMS-SPME is a relatively insensitive method. Hence compounds not appearing in exhaled breath of healthy volunteers may be below the limit of detection (LOD). PTR-MS, on the other hand, does not need preconcentration and gives much more reliable quantitative results then GCMS-SPME. The shortcoming of PTR-MS is that it cannot identify compounds with certainty. Hence SPME-GCMS and PTR-MS complement each other, each method having its particular advantages and disadvantages. Exhaled breath analysis is promising to become a future non-invasive lung cancer screening method. In order to proceed towards this goal, precise identification of compounds observed in exhaled breath of lung cancer patients is necessary. Comparison with compounds released from lung cancer cell cultures, and additional information on exhaled breath composition in other cancer forms will be important.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Genetics,Oncology
Reference55 articles.
1. Chan HP, Lewis C, Thomas PS: Exhaled breath analysis: novel approach for early detection of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009, 63 (2): 164-168. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.05.020. 2. Corradi M, Poli D, Selis L, Carbognani P, Acampa O, Iavicoli S, Rusca M, Mutti A: [Volatile hydrocarbons in exhaled air: preliminary data on the characteristic profile associated with lung tumors]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2003, 25 (Suppl 3): 59-60. 3. Di Natale C, Macagnano A, Martinelli E, Paolesse R, D'Arcangelo G, Roscioni C, Finazzi-Agro A, D'Amico A: Lung cancer identification by the analysis of breath by means of an array of non-selective gas sensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2003, 18 (10): 1209-1218. 10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00086-1. 4. Dragonieri S, Annema JT, Schot R, Schee van der MP, Spanevello A, Carratu P, Resta O, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ: An electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and COPD. Lung Cancer. 2009, 64 (2): 166-170. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.008. 5. Phillips M, Altorki N, Austin JH, Cameron RB, Cataneo RN, Greenberg J, Kloss R, Maxfield RA, Munawar MI, Pass HI, et al: Prediction of lung cancer using volatile biomarkers in breath. Cancer Biomark. 2007, 3 (2): 95-109.
Cited by
473 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|