Author:
Booth Christopher M,Dranitsaris George,Gainford M Corona,Berry Scott,Fralick Michael,Fralick John,Sue Joanna,Clemons Mark
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Setting priorities for the funding of new anti-cancer agents is becoming increasingly complex. The funding of adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer has brought this dilemma to the fore. In this paper we review external factors that may influence decision-making bodies and present a case study of media response in Ontario, Canada to adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer.
Methods
A comprehensive search of the databases of Canadian national and local newspapers and television was performed. Articles pertaining to trastuzumab in adjuvant breast cancer as well as 17 other anti-cancer drugs and indications were retrieved. The search period was from the date when individual trial results were announced to the date funding was made available in Ontario.
Results
During the 2.6 months between the release of the trastuzumab results to funding approval in Ontario, we identified 51 episodes of media coverage. For the 17 other drugs/indications (7 breast and 10 non-breast), the median time to funding approval was 31 months (range 14–46). Other recent major advances in oncology such as adjuvant vinorelbine/cisplatin for resected NSCLC and docetaxel for advanced prostate cancer received considerably less media attention (17 media reports for each) than trastuzumab. The median number of media reports for breast cancer drugs was 4.5 compared to 2.5 for non-breast cancer drugs (p = 0.56).
Conclusion
Priority-setting for novel anti-cancer agents is a complex process that tries to ensure fair use of constrained resources to fund therapies with the best evidence of clinical benefit. However, this process is subject to external factors including the influence of media, patient advocates, politicians, and industry. The data in this case study serve to illustrate the significant involvement one (or all) of these external factors may play in the debate over priority-setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Genetics,Oncology
Reference41 articles.
1. Daniels N: Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ. 2000, 351: 1300-1301. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300.
2. Foy R, So J, Rous E, Scarffe JH: Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold. BMJ. 1999, 318: 456-459.
3. Martin DK, Pater JL, Singer PA: Priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative study. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9294): 1678-1681.
4. Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S: Mass media intervention: effect on health service utilization. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002, 1
5. Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Bradbury , Pehl LJ: Media coverage of the Child B case. BMJ. 1996, 312: 1587-1591.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献