Author:
Feldle Philipp,Grunz Jan-Peter,Kunz Andreas Steven,Pannenbecker Pauline,Patzer Theresa Sophie,Pichlmeier Svenja,Sauer Stephanie Tina,Hendel Robin,Ergün Süleyman,Bley Thorsten Alexander,Huflage Henner
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Unenhanced abdominal CT constitutes the diagnostic standard of care in suspected urolithiasis. Aiming to identify potential for radiation dose reduction in this frequent imaging task, this experimental study compares the effect of spectral shaping and tube voltage modulation on image quality.
Methods
Using a third-generation dual-source CT, eight cadaveric specimens were scanned with varying tube voltage settings with and without tin filter application (Sn 150, Sn 100, 120, 100, and 80 kVp) at three dose levels (3 mGy: standard; 1 mGy: low; 0.5 mGy: ultralow). Image quality was assessed quantitatively by calculation of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for various tissues (spleen, kidney, trabecular bone, fat) and subjectively by three independent radiologists based on a seven-point rating scale (7 = excellent; 1 = very poor).
Results
Irrespective of dose level, Sn 100 kVp resulted in the highest SNR of all tube voltage settings. In direct comparison to Sn 150 kVp, superior SNR was ascertained for spleen (p ≤ 0.004) and kidney tissue (p ≤ 0.009). In ultralow-dose scans, subjective image quality of Sn 100 kVp (median score 3; interquartile range 3–3) was higher compared with conventional imaging at 120 kVp (2; 2–2), 100 kVp (1; 1–2), and 80 kVp (1; 1–1) (all p < 0.001). Indicated by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945 (95% confidence interval: 0.927–0.960), interrater reliability was excellent.
Conclusions
In abdominal CT with maximised dose reduction, tin prefiltration at 100 kVp allows for superior image quality over Sn 150 kVp and conventional imaging without spectral shaping.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–5.
2. Chewcharat A, Curhan G. Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016. Urolithiasis. 2021;49:27–39.
3. Paraboschi I, Gnech M, De Marco EA, Minoli DG, Bebi C, Zanetti SP, et al. Pediatric Urolithiasis: current Surgical strategies and future perspectives. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1–7.
4. Benson DA, Maxwell RM, Poeter E, Ibrahim H, Dean A, Revielle J, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Assoc Urol. 2019;49:1–88.
5. Coursey CA, Casalino DD, Remer EM, Arellano RS, Bishoff JT, Dighe M, et al. ACR appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset Flank Pain–Suspicion of Stone Disease. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28:227–33.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献