Author:
Zhang Ruyi,Wang Peng,Bian Yanzhu,Fan Yan,Li Jianming,Liu Xuehui,Shen Jie,Hu Yujing,Liao Xianghe,Wang He,Song Chengyu,Li Wangxiao,Wang Xiaojie,Sun Momo,Zhang Jianping,Wang Miao,Wang Shen,Shen Yiming,Zhang Xuemei,Jia Qiang,Tan Jian,Li Ning,Wang Sen,Xu Lingyun,Wu Weiming,Zhang Wei,Meng Zhaowei
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to develop and validate an AI (artificial intelligence)-aid method in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to differentiate ischemia in coronary artery disease.
Methods
We retrospectively selected 599 patients who had received gated-MPI protocol. Images were acquired using hybrid SPECT-CT systems. A training set was used to train and develop the neural network and a validation set was used to test the predictive ability of the neural network. We used a learning technique named “YOLO” to carry out the training process. We compared the predictive accuracy of AI with that of physician interpreters (beginner, inexperienced, and experienced interpreters).
Results
Training performance showed that the accuracy ranged from 66.20% to 94.64%, the recall rate ranged from 76.96% to 98.76%, and the average precision ranged from 80.17% to 98.15%. In the ROC analysis of the validation set, the sensitivity range was 88.9 ~ 93.8%, the specificity range was 93.0 ~ 97.6%, and the AUC range was 94.1 ~ 96.1%. In the comparison between AI and different interpreters, AI outperformed the other interpreters (most P-value < 0.05).
Conclusion
The AI system of our study showed excellent predictive accuracy in the diagnosis of MPI protocols, and therefore might be potentially helpful to aid radiologists in clinical practice and develop more sophisticated models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference37 articles.
1. Malakar AK, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(10):16812–23.
2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38-360.
3. Sonecha TN, Delis KT. Prevalence and distribution of coronary disease in claudicants using 12-lead precordial stress electrocardiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(6):519–26.
4. Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah A, Assi V, Lewis S, Mangion K, et al. Symptoms and quality of life in patients with suspected angina undergoing CT coronary angiography: a randomised controlled trial. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2017;103(13):995–1001.
5. Van Mieghem CA, Thury A, Meijboom WB, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Weustink AC, et al. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(16):1968–76.