Author:
Gu Siqian,Qian Jing,Yang Ling,Sun Zhilei,Hu Chunhong,Wang Ximing,Hu Su,Xie Yuyang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Differentiating between low-grade glioma and brain glial cell hyperplasia is crucial for the customized clinical treatment of patients.
Objective
Based on multiparametric MRI imaging and clinical risk factors, a radiomics-clinical model and nomogram were constructed for the distinction of brain glial cell hyperplasia from low-grade glioma.
Methods
Patients with brain glial cell hyperplasia and low-grade glioma who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively included. In this study, A total of 41 patients of brain glial cell hyperplasia and 87 patients of low-grade glioma were divided into training group and validation group randomly at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics features were extracted from T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-enhanced). Then, LASSO, SVM, and RF models were created in order to choose a model with a greater level of efficiency for calculating each patient’s Rad-score (radiomics score). The independent risk factors were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to filter the Rad-score and clinical risk variables in turn. A radiomics-clinical model was next built of which effectiveness was assessed.
Results
Brain glial cell hyperplasia and low-grade gliomas from the 128 cases were randomly divided into 10 groups, of which 7 served as training group and 3 as validation group. The mass effect and Rad-score were two independent risk variables used in the construction of the radiomics-clinical model, and their respective AUCs for the training group and validation group were 0.847 and 0.858. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the validation group were 0.821, 0.750, and 0.852 respectively.
Conclusion
Combining with radiomics constructed by multiparametric MRI images and clinical features, the radiomics-clinical model and nomogram that were developed to distinguish between brain glial cell hyperplasia and low-grade glioma had a good performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference25 articles.
1. Mori S, Suzuki SO, Honda H, Hamasaki H, Sakae N, Sasagasako N, et al. Symmetrical glial hyperplasia in the brainstem of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Neuropathology. 2021;41(2):146–51.
2. Shao-Feng Z, Yi-Wei H, Yang S, Si-Jie X, Jian-Ming S, Hong-Bo Y. Research based on the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of glial cells in Alzheimer’s Disease. World J Complex Med. 2021;7(3):15–7.
3. Shenoy A. Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist’s perspective. Br J Radiol, 2011, 84 Spec No 2(Spec Iss 2): S209–12.
4. Feng Z, Mao Z, Wang Z, Liao B, Zhu Y, Wang H. Non-adenomatous pituitary tumours mimicking functioning pituitary adenomas. Br J Neurosurg. 2020;34(5):487–91.
5. Biaorui S, Zhenyu L, Pingping H, Yu L. Effect of electroacupuncture on reactive astrogliosis of rats with spinal cord injury. Int J Traditional Chin Med. 2019;41(3):263–8.