Author:
Chaudhari Gunvant R.,Chillakuru Yeshwant R.,Chen Timothy L.,Pedoia Valentina,Vu Thienkhai H.,Hess Christopher P.,Seo Youngho,Sohn Jae Ho
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The comprehensiveness and maintenance of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria (AC) makes it a unique resource for evidence-based clinical imaging decision support, but it is underutilized by clinicians. To facilitate the use of imaging recommendations, we develop a natural language processing (NLP) search algorithm that automatically matches clinical indications that physicians write into imaging orders to appropriate AC imaging recommendations.
Methods
We apply a hybrid model of semantic similarity from a sent2vec model trained on 223 million scientific sentences, combined with term frequency inverse document frequency features. AC documents are ranked based on their embeddings’ cosine distance to query. For model testing, we compiled a dataset of simulated simple and complex indications for each AC document (n = 410) and another with clinical indications from randomly sampled radiology reports (n = 100). We compare our algorithm to a custom google search engine.
Results
On the simulated indications, our algorithm ranked ground truth documents as top 3 for 98% of simple queries and 85% of complex queries. Similarly, on the randomly sampled radiology report dataset, the algorithm ranked 86% of indications with a single match as top 3. Vague and distracting phrases present in the free-text indications were main sources of errors. Our algorithm provides more relevant results than a custom Google search engine, especially for complex queries.
Conclusions
We have developed and evaluated an NLP algorithm that matches clinical indications to appropriate AC guidelines. This approach can be integrated into imaging ordering systems for automated access to guidelines.
Funder
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference26 articles.
1. Agapova M, Bresnahan BB, Higashi M, Kessler L, Garrison LP, Devine B. A proposed approach for quantitative benefit-risk assessment in diagnostic radiology guideline development: the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria example. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(1):128–38.
2. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Search [Internet]. ACR.org. [cited 2020 May 11]. Available from: https://acsearch.acr.org/.
3. Kozak B, Webb EM, Khan BK, Orozco NM, Straus CM, Naeger DM. Medical student usage of the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(12):1606–11.
4. Bautista AB, Burgos A, Nickel BJ, Yoon JJ, Tilara AA, Amorosa JK. Do clinicians use the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria in the management of their patients? Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1581–5.
5. ACR Select-National Decision Support Company [Internet]. CareSelect. [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://nationaldecisionsupport.com/acrselect/.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献