Author:
Sun Kui,Yu Shuxia,Wang Ying,Jia Rongze,Shi Rongchao,Liang Changhu,Wang Ximing,Wang Haiyan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To investigate whether CT-based radiomics can effectively differentiate between heterotopic pancreas (HP) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and whether different resampling methods can affect the model’s performance.
Methods
Multi-phase CT radiological data were retrospectively collected from 94 patients. Of these, 40 with HP and 54 with GISTs were enrolled between April 2017 and November 2021. One experienced radiologist manually delineated the volume of interest and then resampled the voxel size of the images to 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3, 1 × 1 × 1 mm3, and 2 × 2 × 2 mm3, respectively. Radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics, resulting in 1218 features from each phase image. The datasets were randomly divided into training set (n = 66) and validation set (n = 28) at a 7:3 ratio. After applying multiple feature selection methods, the optimal features were screened. Radial basis kernel function-based support vector machine (RBF-SVM) was used as the classifier, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) analysis, as well as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results
The combined phase model performed better than the other phase models, and the resampling method of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 achieved the highest performance with an AUC of 0.953 (0.881-1), accuracy of 0.929, sensitivity of 0.938, and specificity of 0.917 in the validation set. The Delong test showed no significant difference in AUCs among the three resampling methods, with p > 0.05.
Conclusions
Radiomics can effectively differentiate between HP and GISTs on CT images, and the diagnostic performance of radiomics is minimally affected by different resampling methods.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Academic Promotion Programme of Shandong First Medical University
Cancer Prevention and Treatment fund of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation
Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Rezvani M, Menias C, Sandrasegaran K, Olpin JD, Elsayes KM, Shaaban AM. Heterotopic pancreas: Histopathologic Features, imaging findings, and complications. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):484–99.
2. Kung JW, Brown A, Kruskal JB, Goldsmith JD, Pedrosa I. Heterotopic pancreas: typical and atypical imaging findings. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(5):403–7.
3. Wei R, Wang QB, Chen QH, Liu JS, Zhang B. Upper gastrointestinal tract heterotopic pancreas: findings from CT and endoscopic imaging with histopathologic correlation. Clin Imaging. 2011;35(5):353–9.
4. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;10(2):81–9.
5. Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C, et al. KIT activation is an ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61(22):8118–21.