Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of the retrospective study was to analyze the reliability and repeatability of specific landmark-positions used in cephalometry to determine the major sources of absolute landmark position differences for repeated, time-separated (time-point I and II) digital cephalometric radiographs (CEPH) of the same patients.
Methods
100 pairs of CPEHs from the database of a sample of adult patients (18 to 28 years) were analyzed by one calibrated observer and three landmark points (Sella: S, Nasion: N, Subspinale: A) were digitally marked using ImageJ-software. The coordinates of these points entered the evaluation using displacement vectors as primary endpoints between the coordinates of the landmarks in the two images as well as SNA-angles and the angle ω of SN relative to the floor.
Results
Displacement vectors between CEPHI and CEPHII were rather large (N: 7.95 ± 4.85 mm, S: 5.34 ± 3.50 mm, A: 4.81 ± 3.95 mm. SNA was rather stable between the two sequential radiographs (mean difference: 0.002° ± 1.85°). and did not correlate with age of the patient (SNAI: spearman-Rho: 0.0239, p = 0.8134; SNAII : spearman-Rho: 0.0244, p = 0.8096). Although the vertical angle ω did not differ between CEPHI and CEPHII (mean difference: 0.4° ± 4.7°, pwilcoxon = 0.8155), it showed a quadratic relationship (pF−statistic: < 2.2e−16) with the length of the displacement vector N.
Conclusion
The significantly varying location of the reference points S, N and A between time-separated CEPHs of one patient can largely be explained by different angulation (head rotation within the sagittal plane) of the Frankfurt plane to the floor (horizontal plane).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference29 articles.
1. Rickets RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics: the first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:115–50.
2. Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:447–54.
3. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The cephalometric projection. Part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1983;12:101–8.
4. Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:100–6.
5. Durão AR, Pittayapat P, Rockenbach MI, Olszewski R, Ng S, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R. Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:31.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献