Comparison of whole blood and PBMC assays for T-cell functional analysis

Author:

Deenadayalan Anbarasu,Maddineni Prabhavathi,Raja Alamelu

Abstract

Abstract Background Tuberculosis remains the foremost cause of morbidity and mortality, more than any other single infectious disease in the world. Cell mediated immune response plays a crucial role in the control of tuberculosis. Therefore, measuring cell mediated immune response against the antigens is having a vital role in understanding the pathogenesis of tuberculosis, which will also help in the diagnosis of and vaccination for tuberculosis. Findings The aim of the present study was to compare and optimize the assay conditions to measure the cell mediated immune response against M. tuberculosis specific antigens. Because the conventional PBMC assays (due to requirement of large volume of blood sample) are unable to screen more number of antigens within the same blood sample. So, here we have compared 6 days culture supernatants of 1:5 and 1:10 diluted blood and PBMCs from healthy laboratory volunteers, to assess the proliferative response of T lymphocytes and secreted IFN-γ levels against purified recombinant antigen of M. tuberculosis (MPT51, Rv3803c), crude antigens of M. tuberculosis (PPD) and mitogen (PHA). Conclusions We have observed good correlation between each assay and also the mean difference of these assays did not reach the statistical significance (p > 0.05). From these results, we conclude that 1:10 diluted whole-blood cultures can be well-suited as an alternative assay to measure cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation in comparison to the conventional PBMC assays. Moreover, 1:10 diluted blood assays require less volume of blood when compared to PBMC assays which will be useful particularly in paediatric and field studies in endemic countries, where blood volume is a limiting factor.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3