Author:
Bruns Helge,Rahbari Nuh N,Löffler Thorsten,Diener Markus K,Seiler Christoph M,Glanemann Matthias,Butturini Giovanni,Schuhmacher Christoph,Rossion Inga,Büchler Markus W,Junghans Tido,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Concomitant treatment in addition to intervention may influence the primary outcome, especially in complex interventions such as surgical trials. Evidence-based standards for perioperative care after distal pancreatectomy, however, have been rarely defined. This study's objective was therefore to identify and analyse the current basis of evidence for perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy.
Methods
A standardised questionnaire was sent to 23 European centres recruiting patients for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on open distal pancreatectomy that would compare suture versus stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant (DISPACT trial, ISRCTN 18452029). Perioperative strategies (e.g., bowel preparation, pain management, administration of antibiotics, abdominal incision, drainages, nasogastric tubes, somatostatin, mobilisation and feeding regimens) were assessed. Moreover, a systematic literature search in the Medline database was performed and retrieved meta-analyses and RCTs were reviewed.
Results
All 23 centres returned the questionnaire. Consensus for thoracic epidural catheters (TECs), pain treatment and transverse incisions was found, as well as strong consensus for the placement of intra-abdominal drainages and perioperative single-shot antibiotics. Also, there was consensus that bowel preparation, somatostatin application, postoperative nasogastric tubes and intravenous feeding might not be beneficial. The literature search identified 16 meta-analyses and 19 RCTs demonstrating that bowel preparation, somatostatin therapy and nasogastric tubes can be omitted. Early mobilisation, feeding and TECs seem to be beneficial for patients. The value of drainages remains unclear.
Conclusion
Most perioperative standards within the centres participating in the DISPACT trial are in accordance with current available evidence. The need for drainages requires further investigation.
Trial registration
Clinical trial registration
: ISRCTN 18452029
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference62 articles.
1. Anderson ADG, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ: Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg. 2003, 90: 1497-1504. 10.1002/bjs.4371.
2. Gervaz P, Bucher P, Scheiwiller A, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P: The duration of postoperative ileus after elective colectomy is correlated to surgical specialization. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006, 21: 542-546. 10.1007/s00384-005-0050-0.
3. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW: Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008, 248: 189-198. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
4. Wasey N, Baughan J, de Gara CJ: Prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery: the cost of ignoring the evidence. Can J Surg. 2003, 46: 279-284.
5. Wichmann MW, Roth M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ: A prospective clinical feasibility study for multimodal "fast track" rehabilitation in elective pancreatic cancer surgery. Rozhl Chir. 2006, 85: 169-175.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献