Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol

Published:2014-01-23 Issue:1 Volume:15 Page:
ISSN:1745-6215
Container-title:Trials
language:en
Short-container-title:Trials

Author:

Wu Darong,Akl Elie A,Guyatt Gordon H,Devereaux Philip J,Brignardello-Petersen Romina,Prediger Barbara,Patel Krupesh,Patel Namrata,Lu Taoying,Zhang Yuan,Falavigna Maicon,Santesso Nancy,Mustafa Reem A,Zhou Qi,Briel Matthias,Schünemann Holger J

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1745-6215-15-33.pdf

Reference37 articles.

1. Easterbrook PJ, Matthews DR: Fate of research studies. J R Soc Med. 1992, 85 (2): 71-76.

2. Ashery RS, McAuliffe WE: Implementation issues and techniques in randomized trials of outpatient psychosocial treatments for drug abusers: recruitment of subjects. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1992, 18 (3): 305-329. 10.3109/00952999209026069.

3. Charlson ME, Horwitz RI: Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984, 289 (6454): 1281-1284. 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1281.

4. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lewin-Van Den Broek NT, Lassen A, Vickers L, Myres P: How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract. 2003, 20 (1): 83-92. 10.1093/fampra/20.1.83.

5. Haidich AB, Ioannidis JP: Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54 (9): 877-883. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00353-5.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Traditional Dry Cupping Therapy Versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in the Treatment of Idiopathic Menorrhagia: A Randomized Controlled Trial;Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal;2018-02-10

2. Unbalanced rather than balanced randomized controlled trials are more often positive in favor of the new treatment: an exposed and nonexposed study;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2015-08

3. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study;Systematic Reviews;2014-11-26