Abstract
AbstractFetal macrosomia is associated with maternal and newborn complications due to incorrect fetal weight estimation or inappropriate choice of delivery models. The early screening and evaluation of macrosomia in the third trimester can improve delivery outcomes and reduce complications. However, traditional clinical and ultrasound examinations face difficulties in obtaining accurate fetal measurements during the third trimester of pregnancy. This study aims to develop a comprehensive predictive model for detecting macrosomia using machine learning (ML) algorithms. The accuracy of macrosomia prediction using logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, random forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms was explored. Each approach was trained and validated using data from 3244 pregnant women at a hospital in southern China. The information gain method was employed to identify deterministic features associated with the occurrence of macrosomia. The performance of six ML algorithms based on the recall and area under the curve evaluation metrics were compared. To develop an efficient prediction model, two sets of experiments based on ultrasound examination records within 1-7 days and 8-14 days prior to delivery were conducted. The ensemble model, comprising the RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms, showed encouraging results. For each experimental group, the proposed ensemble model outperformed other ML approaches and the traditional Hadlock formula. The experimental results indicate that, with the most risk-relevant features, the ML algorithms presented in this study can predict macrosomia and assist obstetricians in selecting more appropriate delivery models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Vitner D, Bleicher I, Kadour-Peero E, Lipworth H, Sagi S, Gonen R (2019) Does prenatal identification of fetal macrosomia change management and outcome? Arch Gynecol Obstet 299:635-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5003-2
2. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM (2006) Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(3):657-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007
3. Abitbol MM (1996) The shapes of the female pelvis. Contributing factors. J Reprod Med 41(4):242-250
4. Moloy HC (1960) The use of the roentgen ray in obstetrics. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
5. Caldwell WE, Moloy HC (1933) Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 26(4):479-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(33)90194-5