Exploring use of coercion in the Norwegian ambulance service – a qualitative study

Author:

Thorvaldsen Nina OeyeORCID,Husum Tonje Lossius,Sollid Stephen J.M.

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare laws allow for exceptions from the consent requirement when patients are not competent to consent or pose a danger to themselves or others. In these cases, the use of coercion may be an alternative to voluntary health care. Ambulance personnel are regularly confronted with patients who need healthcare but refuse it and/or refuse to cooperate. This study aimed to explore ambulance personnel`s experience with use of coercion and factors influencing the use of coercion in the ambulance service in Norway. Method We conducted two focus group interviews with a total of eight informants, all ambulance personnel from a large Norwegian ambulance service. Digital recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using systematic text condensation. Results The informants` stories revealed several methods of coercion used by the ambulance personnel; physical coercion, pragmatic coercion, pharmacological coercion and coercion used to ensure the patient is secured during transportation. The main reasons for using coercion were preventing patients from harming themselves or others and to ensure that patients unable to consent receive healthcare considered necessary. Systemic factors as difficulty of applying the law to real-life situations, and organizational factors as fear of breaching guidelines, experienced lack of support from the management, fear of charges of misconduct, and lack of training in assessing patients´ competence to consent seem to influence ambulance personnels use of coercion. Conclusion Ethical grey areas in clinical practice emphasize the need for clinical discretion. Despite the fact that regulatory provisions allow for exceptions from the requirement to obtain consent, transferring these regulations to real life prehospital settings can be difficult. Consequently, the decisions made by ambulance personnel in clinical situations are highly influenced by organizational ethos and guidelines. The informants describe the coercive interventions they have employed to manage patients who are deemed to require healthcare but refuse it and/or refuse to cooperate.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. United Nations. Human Rights [Available from: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.

2. Grunnloven. Kongeriket Norges Grunnlov 1814 Accessed 14 Jun 2021. Available from: https://lovdata.no/lov/1814-05-17-nn.

3. NOU. 2019: 14. Tvangsbegrensningsloven. Del 18- tvangsbegrepet.2019 14 Jun 2021. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2019-14/id2654803/.

4. Helsepersonelloven. Lov om helsepersonell m.v. LOV-1999-07-02-641999 Accessed 14 Jun 2021. Available from: https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-02-64.

5. Pasient- og brukerrettighetsloven. Lov om pasient- og brukerrettigheter. LOV-1999-05-21-302001 Accessed 14 jun 2021. Available from: https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-02-63.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3