Abstract
Abstract
Background
Parents often contact out-of-hours services due to worry concerning febrile children, despite the children rarely being severely ill. As telephone triage of children is challenging, many children are referred to hospital assessment. This study investigated if video triage resulted in more children staying at home. Secondary aims included safety, acceptability and feasibility of this new triage tool.
Methods
In this prospective quality improvement study, nurse call-handlers enrolled febrile children aged 3 months-5 years to video or telephone triage (1:1), with follow-up within 48 h after call. The setting was an out-of-hours call-center for non-urgent illness in Copenhagen, Denmark, receiving over 1 million calls annually and predominately staffed by registered nurses. Main outcome measure was difference in number of children assessed at hospital within 8 h after call between video-and telephone triage group. Rates of feasibility, acceptability and safety (death, lasting means, transfer to intensive care unit) were compared between the triage groups.
Results
There was no difference in triage outcome (home care vs. hospital referral) or number of patients assessed at hospital between triage groups. However, more video triaged patients received in-hospital treatment, testing and hospitalization.
Conclusion
Video triage was feasible to conduct, acceptable to parents and as safe as telephone triage. The study did not show that more children stayed at home after video triage, possibly because the allocation strategy was not upheld, as video triage sometimes was chosen in cases of complex and severe symptoms, and this likely has changed study outcome.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov.: Id NCT04074239. Registered 2019-08-30. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04074239
Funder
TrygFonden
Region Hovedstaden
Hvidovre Hospital
Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Wahlberg AC, Cedersund E, Wredling R. Telephone nurses’ experience of problems with telephone advice in Sweden. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(1):37–45.
2. Wahlberg AC, Cedersund E, Wredling R. Bases for assessments made by telephone advice nurses. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(8):403–7.
3. Holmström I, Höglund AT. The faceless encounter: ethical dilemmas in telephone nursing. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(10):1865–71.
4. Holmström I, Dall’Alba G. “Carer and gatekeeper”–conflicting demands in nurses’ experiences of telephone advisory services. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16(2):142–8.
5. De Bont EGPM, Lepot JMM, Hendrix DAS, Loonen N, Guldemond-Hecker Y, Dinant GJ, et al. Workload and management of childhood fever at general practice out-of-hours care: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):1–6.