Abstract
Abstract
Background
Without increasing radiation exposure, ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) of the chest provides improved diagnostic accuracy of radiological pneumonia diagnosis compared to a chest radiograph. Yet, radiologist resources to rapidly report the chest CTs are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of emergency clinicians’ assessments of chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia using a radiologist’s assessments as reference standard.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Ten emergency department clinicians (five junior clinicians, five consultants) assessed chest ultralow-dose CTs from acutely hospitalised patients suspected of having community-acquired pneumonia. Before assessments, the clinicians attended a focused training course on assessing ultralow-dose CTs for pneumonia. The reference standard was the assessment by an experienced emergency department radiologist. Primary outcome was the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities consistent with community-acquired pneumonia. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using generalised estimating equations.
Results
All clinicians assessed 128 ultralow-dose CTs. The prevalence of findings consistent with community-acquired pneumonia was 56%. Seventy-eight percent of the clinicians’ CT assessments matched the reference assessment. Diagnostic accuracy estimates were: sensitivity = 83% (95%CI: 77–88), specificity = 70% (95%CI: 59–81), positive predictive value = 80% (95%CI: 74–84), negative predictive value = 78% (95%CI: 73–82).
Conclusion
This study found that clinicians could assess chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia with high diagnostic accuracy. A higher level of clinical experience was not associated with better diagnostic accuracy.
Funder
Region Syddanmark
Sønderjylland Hospital
University of Southern Denmark
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Aliberti S, Dela Cruz CS, Amati F, Sotgiu G, Restrepo MI. Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet. 2021;398(10303):906–19.
2. Klompas M, Ramirez JA, Bond S. Clinical evaluation and diagnostic testing for community-acquired pneumonia in adults UpToDate [updated 2023.01.03. 73.0:[Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-evaluation-and-diagnostic-testing-for-community-acquired-pneumonia-in-adults. Accessed 4 January 2024
3. Long DA, Long B, Koyfman A. Clinical mimics: an emergency medicine focused review of pneumonia mimics. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(4):539–47.
4. Septimus EJ. Antimicrobial resistance: an antimicrobial/diagnostic stewardship and infection prevention approach. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(5):819–29.
5. Ebell MH, Chupp H, Cai X, Bentivegna M, Kearney M. Accuracy of signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(7):541–53.