Abstract
Abstract
Background
This research investigated surgical interventions for the treatment of extremity and pelvic fractures and aimed to provide an analysis of management challenges under crisis conditions in a Level I Trauma Center after Türkiye’s February 6, 2023, earthquakes.
Methods
The study was a retrospective examination of the medical records of 243 fracture cases associated with the earthquakes. The age, gender, time of admission, types of extremity and pelvic fractures, anatomical localizations, and surgical treatment methods for fractures were recorded. The results of these parameters were evaluated in detail, together with the results of other surgical treatments performed in the hospital in the first week after the disaster, such as fasciotomy, amputation, and wound debridement.
Results
Most of the 243 (119 males and 124 females) patients with extremity fractures and pelvic fractures receiving surgical treatment were adults (n = 182, 74.9%). The most common lower extremity fractures among all fracture cases were tibial shaft (30.8%) and femoral shaft (20.6%) fractures. A total of 33 patients had surgical procedures for the treatment of two or more significant bone fractures involving either the extremity or the pelvic ring. The analysis showed that the median age of patients who underwent surgery due to extremity and pelvic fractures was 36 years, with a range of 1 to 91 years, which was statistically increased compared to patients who received surgery for other musculoskeletal injuries such as fasciotomy, amputation and debridement (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Fractures were one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries in the first days after earthquakes, and the management of fractures differs significantly from soft tissue injuries and amputation surgeries as they require implants, special instruments, and imaging devices. The delivery of healthcare is often critically impaired after a severe earthquake. Shortages of consumables such as orthopedic implants, power drills, fluoroscopy equipment, and the need for additional staff should be addressed immediately after the earthquake, ideally by the end of the first day.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Melgar D, Taymaz T, Ganas A, Crowell B, Öcalan T, Kahraman M et al. Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye [Internet]. Earth Sciences; 2023 May. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/5071/.
2. Türkiye. 2023 Earthquakes Situation Report No. 11, as of 23 March 2023 [Internet]. Türkiye: 2023 Earthquakes Situation Report No. 11, as of 23 March 2023. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 17]. https://reliefweb.int/report/turkiye/turkiye-2023-earthquakes-situation-report-no-11-23-march-2023-entr.
3. Losses. in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes [Internet]. Wikipedia. 2024 [cited 2023 Nov 23]. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Kahramanmaraş_depremlerindeki_kayıplar.
4. Ramirez M, Peek-Asa C. Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:47–55.
5. 2023 KAHRAMANMARAŞ AND HATAY EARTHQUAKES REPORT [Internet]. www.sbb.gov.tr. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/2023-kahramanmaras-ve-hatay-depremleri-raporu/.