Abstract
AbstractThe fig represents one of the oldest and widespread species in the Mediterranean basin, and thanks to man-made selections, it is possible to survey numerous varieties currently used for both main crop and brebas production. The fig is often associated with the birth of horticulture in Mediterranean and Near Asia areas. Figs were probably carried to southern Italy by Phoenicians and successively by Greeks and played an important role in Roman society. Puglia was in the past the most important region in southern Italy to produce figs and especially brebas (first crop), thanks to the excellent qualitative aspects of some varieties such as ‘Petrelli’ (syn. “Fiorone di S. Giovanni,” “Fiorone di S. Antonio”) and ‘Domenico Tauro’ that are mainly cultivated in the provinces of Bari and Brindisi. Main crop production, on the other hand, has always been based on the ‘Dottato’ variety, which was mainly used for drying and is partly consumed fresh, but also processed into jams and marmalades. There are numerous ‘minor’ varieties, which allow Puglia to be among the regions in the world with the greatest fig biodiversity, a kind of living repository grown during the centuries and in the last years rediscovered. However, the consumption and trade are exclusively at the local level, due to limited resistance to handling and shipping of such fruit; only a limited amount is destined to export. The main fig varieties cultivated in Puglia allow a wide ripening calendar starting from the first 10 days of June for brebas (often at the end of May) and ending in late September–October with late ripening varieties. The purpose of this mini review is to highlight the high degree of biodiversity that exists in Puglia region since many centuries, and the importance that this ancient crop could have in modern fruit growing, as it was once a key player in market scenarios in many Mediterranean and Near Asia countries. The fig biodiversity could be used either for fresh and processed consumption or for breeding programs for new varieties with desired traits and qualities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference144 articles.
1. Abdelsalam NR, Awad RM, Ali HM, Salem MZM, Abdellatif KF, Elshikh MS. Morpho- logical, pomological and specific molecular marker resources for genetic diversity analyses in fig (Ficus carica L.). HortScience. 2019;54:1299–309. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14091-19.
2. Aksoy U. Why figs? An old taste and a new perspective. Acta I-Tort. 1998;480:25–7.
3. Aljane F. Caractèrisation et èvaluation des accessions locales de figuier (Ficus carica L.) en Tunisie et selection des plus performantes. MSc Thesisi, Facultè des Sciences de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisie. 2011.
4. Aljane F, Ferchichi A. Assessment of genetic diversity among some southern Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars based on morphological descriptors. Jordan J Agric Sci. 2009;5(1):1–15.
5. Aljane F, Nahdi S. Propagation of some local fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars by hardwood cuttings under the field conditions in Tunisia. Int Sch Res Not. 2014;2014:5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/809450.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献