Abstract
Abstract
Background
Indigenous populations across the world play a significant role in sustainable land management and conservation of biodiversity. However, indigenous agricultural practices are rarely studied in depth and remain poorly documented in many regions of the world. Documenting such practices and identifying policies and incentives that affect them can unlock their potential for better land management and biodiversity conservation.
Methods
We undertook household surveys and focus group discussions to document indigenous practices and the values of trees in Piper (Piper betle) agroforestry practiced by the ethnic Khasi (Pnar) community in the Indian Eastern Himalayas. We also undertook an in-depth vegetation sampling to quantify variations in phytosociology and tree diversity with stand age in Piper agroforestry and nearby native forests. In addition, we undertook strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis and a desk review to identify policies, market support structures and incentives affecting cultivation of Piper, a cash crop of global importance.
Results
Unlike in shifting cultivation, indigenous people do not fell trees in the Piper agroforestry; instead, they allow trees to regenerate naturally and also enrich by planting tree seedlings in the gaps. Depending on the stand age, 30–49 tree species were recorded in the Piper agroforestry compared to 39 in nearby natural forests. While tree density was higher in the natural forests, greater species richness, diversity and basal area was recorded in > 25 years old Piper agroforestry stands. However, landholders do not have legally transferable or heritable rights to the land or trees.
Conclusion
It is concluded that the Piper agroforestry provides a pathway for averting land degradation due to shifting cultivation, biodiversity conservation and improving livelihoods of the indigenous community. Although existing policies are supportive, Piper agroforestry is not currently benefiting from incentives and market support structures. We recommend implementation of policies, market support structures, incentives and payment for ecosystem services so that indigenous communities can benefit from the global ecosystem services they provide.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Bareh H. The history and culture of Khasis. Guwahati: Spectrum Publication; 1967.
2. Berry N, et al. Bio control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum of Piper betle under Gmelina arborea based agroforestry system in Madhya Pradesh. Significance. 2021; 105: 23–97. https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2021/vol9issue2/PartG/9-1-381-329.pdf.
3. Bhutia Y, Liarakou G. Gender and nature in the matrilineal society of Meghalaya, India: searching for ecofeminist perspectives. J Environ Edu. 2018;49:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1407283.
4. Biswas P, Anand U, Saha SC, Kant N, Mishra T, Masih H, et al. Betelvine (Piper betle L.): A comprehensive insight into its ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, and pharmacological, biomedical and therapeutic attributes. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26:3083–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17323.
5. Brahma B, Pathak K, Lal R, Kurmi B, Das M, Nath AJ, Das AK. Ecosystem carbon sequestration through restoration of degraded lands in Northeast India. Land Degrad Dev. 2018;29:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2816.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献