Abstract
Abstract
Background
The invasive aquatic fern Azolla filiculoides has been present in Great Britain (GB) since the end of the nineteenth century, while its specialist natural enemy, the weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was first recorded nearly four decades later, in 1921. The purpose of this study was to estimate the economic value of management cost savings resulting from the presence of S. rufinasus as a biocontrol agent of A. filiculoides in GB, including the value of additional augmentative releases of the weevil made since the mid-2000s, compared with the expected costs of control in the absence of S. rufinasus.
Methods
Estimated economic costs (based on the length/area of affected waterbodies, their infestation rates, and the proportion targeted for management) were calculated for three scenarios in which A. filiculoides occurs in GB: (1) without weevils; (2) with naturalised weevil populations; and (3) with naturalised weevil populations plus augmentative weevil releases.
Results
In the absence of biocontrol, the expected average annual costs of A. filiculoides management were estimated to range from £8.4 to 16.9 million (US$9.4 to 18.9 million) (£1 = US$1.12). The impacts of naturalised S. rufinasus populations on A. filiculoides were expected to reduce management costs to £0.8 to 1.6 million (US$0.9 to 1.8 million) per year. With additional augmentative releases of the weevil, A. filiculoides management costs were estimated to be lower still, ranging from £31.5 to 45.8 thousand (US$35.3 to 51.3 thousand) per year, giving an estimated benefit to cost ratio of augmentative S. rufinasus releases of 43.7:1 to 88.4:1.
Conclusions
The unintentional introduction of the weevil S. rufinasus to GB is estimated to have resulted in millions of pounds of savings annually in management costs for A. filiculoides. Additional augmentative releases of the weevil provide further net cost savings, tackling A. filiculoides outbreaks and bolstering naturalised populations. The use of herbicides in the aquatic environment is likely greatly reduced due to A. filiculoides biocontrol. Although somewhat climate-limited at present in GB, climate change may result in even more effective biocontrol of A. filiculoides by S. rufinasus as has been observed in warmer regions such as South Africa, where the plant is no longer considered a threat since the introduction of the weevil.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Cultural Studies
Reference57 articles.
1. Association of Drainage Authorities. An introduction to internal drainage boards. p. 8. 2017. https://www.ada.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/IDBs_An_Introduction_A5_2017_web.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.
2. Association of Drainage Authorities. The Work of Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs). 2018. https://www.ada.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ADA-Infographic-IDBs-in-Futures.jpg. Accessed 3 Jan 2022.
3. Association of Drainage Authorities. Drainage districts in Wales and Scotland. 2022a. https://www.ada.org.uk/our-members/wales-and-scotland/. Accessed 1 May 2022a.
4. Association of Drainage Authorities. Internal drainage boards. 2022b. https://www.ada.org.uk/member_type/idbs/. Accessed 1 May 2022b.
5. Brown CD, Turner N, Hollis J, Bellamy P, Biggs J, Williams P, Arnold D, Pepper T, Maund S. Morphological and physico-chemical properties of British aquatic habitats potentially exposed to pesticides. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2006;113(1–4):307–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.015.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献