Author:
Milagros Sergio,de Erenchun Pablo Ramírez-Ruiz,Guembe Maite,Carte Beatriz,Méndez Miriam,Uribarri Ander,Aldabe Rafael
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several treatments for genetic diseases utilizing recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) have recently gained approval. However, the development of a greater number of therapeutic AAVs is constrained by certain limitations. While extensive efforts have concentrated on screening AAV genetic libraries, an alternative strategy involves modifying the AAV capsid by attaching various moieties. The capsid of AAV plays a pivotal role in transducing target cells and evading immune responses, making modifications a key avenue for engineering improved variants.
Results
In our study, we replaced specific AAV9 capsid residues with an unnatural amino acid bearing a bioorthogonal group, identifying four positions with no adverse impact on production. Utilizing click chemistry, we attached varying proportions of Cy5.5 to these positions, allowing us to assess the impact of these modifications on AAV9 infectivity in cultured cells. Our findings reveal that both the position and degree of capsid modification significantly affect AAV transduction. While higher amounts of attached molecules lead to an increased number of AAV genomes within cells, this does not positively impact transgene expression. Conversely, a negative impact on transgene expression is observed when the AAV capsid is highly modified, with the degree of this effect associated with the modified residue.
Conclusion
Careful control of both the degree and specific position of capsid modifications is crucial for optimizing transduction efficiency and minimizing undesired effects on transgene expression. These results underscore the importance of precision in AAV capsid modification to achieve optimal transduction efficiency while mitigating potential drawbacks on transgene expression.
Funder
Gobierno de Navarra
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Gaudet D, Méthot J, Déry S, Brisson D, Essiembre C, Tremblay G, et al. Efficacy and long-term safety of alipogene tiparvovec (AAV1-LPL S447X) gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency: An open-label trial. Gene Ther. 2013;20(4):361–9.
2. Russell S, Bennett J, Wellman JA, Chung DC, Yu Z-FF, Tillman A, et al. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 19];390(10097):849–60. Available from: https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0140673617318688/1-s2.0-S0140673617318688-main.pdf?_tid=8483448c-b4d4-11e7-beb4-00000aacb361&acdnat=1508421233_c8d81be56fe4c6b44c6775ba15fae31f.
3. Dabbous O, Maru B, Jansen JP, Lorenzi M, Cloutier M, Guérin A, et al. Survival, Motor Function, and Motor Milestones: Comparison of AVXS-101 Relative to Nusinersen for the Treatment of Infants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1. Adv Ther. 2019;1164–76.
4. Ozelo MC, Mahlangu J, Pasi KJ, Giermasz A, Leavitt AD, Laffan M, et al. Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(11):1013–25.
5. Tai CH, Lee NC, Chien YH, Byrne BJ, Muramatsu SI, Tseng SH, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of eladocagene exuparvovec in patients with AADC deficiency. Mol Ther. 2022;30(2):509–18.