Spatial patterns of Geological Culture Villages (Towns) and their influential factors in China-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Spatial patterns of Geological Culture Villages (Towns) and their influential factors in China

Published:2024-08-21 Issue:1 Volume:12 Page:
ISSN:2050-7445
Container-title:Heritage Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Herit Sci

Author:

Zhang Yunxing,Zhang Zhenyu,Lu Chenchen,Yang Meiyu,Zhao Zhengyu,Gu Cuihua

Abstract

AbstractGeological Culture Villages Towns (GCV(T)s) serve as rich repositories of geological resources, embodying significant historical and cultural values that mirror the dynamic interplay between Earth's evolution and human societies. Despite their importance, the theoretical underpinnings of GCV(T)s have not been thoroughly explored and elucidated. This study explores the relationship between geological culture and societal development, revealing the linkage between geological culture and societal advancement with the aim of promoting a harmonious coexistence between humanity and the environment. Focusing on 96 GCV(T)s in China, this study employs spatial analytical techniques such as the nearest-neighbor index, kernel density analysis, geographic connectivity, and geographic detector to scrutinize the spatial distribution patterns and identify key influencing factors. The findings reveal that (1) GCV(T)s exhibit uneven distribution, with concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta region, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and Shanxi-Gansu and Ningxia Provinces. (2) These sites tend to be situated in areas characterized by active geological formations, abundant geological relics, higher elevations, gentle topography, and ample rainfall. (3) The establishment and evolution of GCV(T)s are shaped by a complex interplay of geological heritage, natural factors, and human interventions. While the selection and spatial arrangement of these sites are predominantly influenced by geological and natural factors, the innovative development of their geological cultural heritage is driven by humanistic considerations. Overall, the distribution and evolution of GCV(T)s stem from multifaceted interactions among diverse factors. Recognizing this intricate web of influences is crucial for safeguarding geocultural diversity and formulating conservation strategies for geoheritage protection. The development of GCV(T)s transcends mere geoheritage preservation, it embodies a pivotal stride toward safeguarding the varied and multi-dimensional global geoheritage.

Funder

Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province

General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of Henan Province Universities

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40494-024-01421-z.pdf

Reference105 articles.

1. Brilha J. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage. 2016;8(2):119–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.

2. Francesca C, Deodato T, Kathryn L. Geological hazards in the UNESCO World Heritage sites of the UK: from the global to the local scale perspective. Earth Sci Rev. 2018;176:166–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.016.

3. Delia EB, Brooke EC, Jaroslav MG, et al. Paleogeography as geological heritage: developing geosite classification. Earth Sci Rev. 2014;138:300–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.005.

4. Tae-Hyeong K, Dal-Yong K, Don-W C, et al. Study on the development of evaluation criteria of geological heritage and the application of basic resource survey. J Korean Nat. 2009;2(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1976-8648(14)60048-7.

5. Jia LQ, Chen XJ, Jia T, et al. IUGS released first 100 Geological Heritage Sites and China has seven in the list. China Geol. 2023;6(1):177–82. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2023004.