Author:
Li Xufang,Zhou Xiangpin,Weng Feifan,Ding Fanzhuo,Wu Yijing,Yi Zhenxin
Abstract
AbstractThe heritage value of the historic urban countryside, as a remnant in the transition between the urban boundary and the natural environment, is a consequence of the spatial and temporal evolution of the city. However, through repeated social transformations, the conflicts between urban construction and cultural landscape heritage preservation have increased, resulting in the gradual disappearance of their cultural landscape heritage. This study takes the Sheshan Urban Countryside Historic District in Shanghai and interprets the layers of Sheshan's cultural landscape heritage into five periods, Emergence, Development and Exploration, Diversity and Prosperity, Turbulence and Change, and Stability and Precipitation. It analyzes the evolution of the layers of the cultural landscape heritage by applying Historic Urban Landscape Historic Land use Assessment (HUL) and interpreting the layers of the cultural heritage of Sheshan using Historical Landscape Assessment (HLA) to identify the characteristics and values of Sheshan's layers of heritage. The study indicates that the cultural landscape heritage of Jiufeng Sheshan exhibits four types of stratigraphic relationships: accretion, juxtaposition, overlay, and decline. This findings suggest a continuous evolutionary feature of superposition of multiple stratigraphic patterns. Moreover, the heritage value of the cultural landscape layers of Jiufeng Sheshan has shown a higher growth rate in the modern period. The integrity and survival status of modern religious and scientific buildings are more complete compared to the literati gardens and Buddhist relics. Based on the knowledge and value assessment of its cultural landscape heritage, it is necessary to intervene in the concept of living conservation and renewal of landscape heritage. This involves devising a conservation and renewal strategy for cultural landscape heritage that conforms to the law of historical stratification and connect the scattered historical and cultural relics. This study provides a reference for the conservation and inheritance of cultural landscape heritage in urban countryside historical areas and the organic renewal of urban and rural heritage.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Logan W. Managing cultural heritage in Asian cities. J Urban Hist. 2020;46(1):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144219873341.
2. Sattayanurak K. Connectivity and Conservation: A Critical Examination of the Relationship Between Infrastructure Development and Cultural Heritage Perception in Chiang Mai, Thailand. International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. 2023;47:1269–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39603-8102.
3. Guo PZ. ErYa.Hangzhou: Zhejiang Ancient Books Publishing House. 2011. (in Chinese).
4. Sun RT, Mai LY, Zhou XP. Analysis of Cultural Landscape Evolution and Characteristic Identification of Historic Countryside Scenic Recreation Sites: A Case Study of Songjiang Jiufeng Area in Shanghai. China Landscape Architecture Society. 2021; 306–311. (in Chinese).
5. Lu HM. Cold Reflections on the Passion for the Countryside - Tasting the Winds of Country Park Construction from a Historical and Cultural Perspective. Landscape Architecture Academic Journal. 2009;08:12–4 (in Chinese).