Author:
Hagan Eric,Poulin Jennifer
Abstract
AbstractMany studies have investigated light-induced damage to colourants in heritage collections using prepared samples of materials such as artist paints and dyed textiles. The body of research focuses primarily on the response of virgin materials, where colour change is assessed with respect to the original colour as light dose increases. From a practical perspective, most objects in museum collections have accumulated a significant light dose from illumination before acquisition, and subsequent years of exhibit lighting. When considering the risk of further degradation, it is often stated by heritage professionals that fugitive colourants with past light exposure are no longer as sensitive due to the slowing rate of visual damage. This is evident by studying ‘fading curves’, where the rate of colour change typically diminishes with increasing light dose. It remains unclear, however, to what degree the lightfastness of remaining colour changes with ongoing exposure. To address the issue, the light sensitivity of residual colour was investigated as a function of prior dose using a published dataset of colour measurements from textiles dyed with early synthetic colourants in the period of 1874–1905. The CIELAB colour values (D65/2°) for each material and dose increment were used to determine the future dose that causes a just-noticeable difference (JND), ΔE00 = 1.7, starting at different amounts of past exposure. This involved resetting the reference CIELAB values to that of the residual colour after each prior dose. The analysis provides an extension of our earlier work, where only the initial lightfastness was reported. A summary of the findings illustrates the shifting distribution of lightfastness, toward higher Blue Wool (BW) ratings with increasing exposure. As the dose progresses, dyes that start at BW1 sensitivity progress to BW2, then BW3 and so on. The findings from this work may assist with boundary approximations of object sensitivity when prior light exposure is known, or a reasonable estimate is available. An analysis of experimental data is summarised as a tool for this type of decision-making process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archeology,Archeology,Conservation,Computer Science Applications,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Chemistry (miscellaneous),Spectroscopy
Reference33 articles.
1. Michalski, S. Agent of Deterioration: light, ultraviolet and infrared. May 2018– July 2022; https://doi.org/https://www.canada.ca/en/conservation-institute/services/agents-deterioration/light.html. Accessed 31 May 2022.
2. Thomson G. The museum environment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1994.
3. Ford B, Smith N. The development of a significance-based lighting framework at the National Museum of Australia. AICCM Bull. 2011;32(1):80–6.
4. Russell R, Winkworth K. Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections. 2nd ed. Rundle Mall: Collections Council of Australia Ltd; 2009.
5. Whitmore PM, Pan X, Bailie C. Predicting the fading of objects: identification of fugitive colorants through direct nondestructive lightfastness measurements. J Am Inst Conserv. 1999;38(3):395–409.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献