Abstract
AbstractCreativity is one of the most important skills in the 21st century student’s toolkit and important to vocational education and training (VET). In the context of vocational teacher education, creativity has not yet played a significant role at universities. This is due in part to the fact that it is unclear what creativity means and how it is fostered in the context of higher education. This interview study explores how creativity is conceptualized by lecturers in vocational teacher education and what creativity-promoting measures or teaching/learning scenarios are applied by them in their courses. Generally, the lecturers interviewed associated creativity in their jobs as lecturers with creating something new. From the lecturer’s perspective, student creativity is categorized into a 5-category model in which lecturers ‘see’ student creativity represented by (1) student self-reflection, (2) independent decision-making, (3) curiosity and motivation, (4) producing something and (5) developing original new ideas. Categories identified by the lecturers that promote creativity in courses are openness, individualization, interaction, student activity and generating solutions. In practice, creativity-promoting measures or teaching/learning scenarios are implemented very differently. The type of implementation determines the implementation depth of the individual category. The findings provide an understanding of creativity from the perspective of university lecturers’, which could be valuable for designing university courses in the future.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Alshebami AS, Seraj AHA, Alzain E (2022) Lecturers’ Creativity and Students’ entrepreneurial intention in Saudi Arabia. Vision 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221099596
2. Anderson RC, Katz-Buonincontro J, Bousselot T, Mattson D, Beard N, Land J, Livie M (2022) How am I a creative teacher? Beliefs, values, and affect for integrating creativity in the classroom. Teach Teacher Educ 110:103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103583
3. Bloom EA, Vanslyke-Briggs K (2019) The demise of Creativity in Tomorrow’s Teachers. J Inq Action Educ 10:5
4. Bryman A (2008) Social research methods, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
5. Cachia R, Ferrari A, Ala-Mutka KM, Punie Y (2010) Creative learning and innovative teaching: final report on the study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in EU Member States. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg