Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to identify the factors, which affect the continuance of mobile learning. The study has looked at epistemological, social, and security risk factors based on Magsayo (Interact Technol Smart Educ 20(2):177–208) and how they affect the perceived functional benefits (PFB) and perceived learner value (PLV). Further locus of control and self-efficacy are two personal factors that are investigated in the study to understand mobile learning acceptance continuance. 260 respondents of the study were students and professionals from India who have used mobile for learning. Based on previous research, hypotheses were formulated and tested empirically by building a model using smart PLS structure equation modeling. It was observed that epistemological, security risk and social factors did affect the computer self-efficacy and locus of control of the learners. Epistemological and social factors do contribute to developing PFB and PLV leading to higher mobile learning acceptance continuance. PFB and PLV also showed mediating effects. Based on Magsayo's (2023) previous work, the study has a unique contribution in showing that epistemological and social factors along with security risk do help in developing PFB and PLV leading to higher mobile learning acceptance continuance. These findings can help us understand ways to the development of mobile learning content and context for higher impact.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference86 articles.
1. Abdullah, M. A., Ebiary, Y. B., & Al-Sammarraie, N. (2017). Determine factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education institution of Malaysia: Online based learning. International Journal on Contemporary Computer Research, 1(1), 43–49.
2. Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Madadha, A., & Zvirzdinaite, Z. (2018). Modeling students’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in higher education: An empirical study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3256
3. Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2020). Analysis the effect of different factors on the development of mobile learning applications at different stages of usage. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 16139–16154. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2963333
4. Bagozzi, R., University of Michigan. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122
5. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 125–139.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献