Author:
Winter M. G.,Waaser T.,Fiddes G.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In August 2004 a series of debris flows caused significant disruption to the Scottish (strategic) Trunk Road Network. The subsequent Scottish Road Network Landslides Study identified a number of sites considered to be at highest risk. Some of these sites have been the subject of formal quantitative assessment of the risk from debris flow to mobile road users in vehicles. The A82 in Glen Coe has the added complication that two car parks have developed on debris fans exposing significant numbers of people to the risk while, they are essentially static and largely outside their vehicles.
Methodology
The risk to road users is determined using a previously developed probabilistic methodology for mobile road users (mobile elements at risk) and a new and related methodology developed for static road users (static elements at risk) is described and applied. Within the latter, an entirely new metric of Annual Average Daily Visits is used to allow the temporal component of the probability of a landslide impacting a person to be determined given the occurrence of an event.
Results
While Personal Individual Risk is at an acceptable level, including for frequent users, the risk presented to society as a whole presents a rather different picture; this is largely due to the number of visitors. The results assess the overall, societal risk for mobile elements at risk as As Low As reasonably Practicable, being at a similar level to other sites, albeit with a higher risk associated with higher numbers of fatalities. The results for the static elements at risk on the other hand suggest that the risks are classified as Unacceptable for higher numbers of fatalities. The assessment of the total societal risk, for mobile and static elements at risk, at the A82 Glen Coe suggests As Low As Reasonably Practicable for low numbers of fatalities but classify as Unacceptable for higher numbers of fatalities (around 20 to 250).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. AGS (2000) Australian geomechanics society—landslide risk management concepts and guidelines. Australian Geomech 35(1):49–92
2. AGS (2007) Australian geomechanics society—practice note guidance for landslide risk management. Aust. Geomech. 42(1):63–114
3. Ale BJM (2005) Tolerable or acceptable: a comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Risk Anal 25(2):231–241
4. Anon (2018) Great Britain tourism survey. Accessed February/March 2020. https://gbtsscotlandlightviewer.kantar.com/ViewTable.aspx.
5. Bailey EB, Maufe HB (1916) The geology of Ben Nevis and Glen Coe and the surrounding country (Explanation of Sheet 53). Memoirs of the Geological Survey, Scotland. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献