Quantitative risk assessment for static and mobile road users: methodology and application at A82 Glen Coe, Scotland

Author:

Winter M. G.,Waaser T.,Fiddes G.

Abstract

Abstract Background In August 2004 a series of debris flows caused significant disruption to the Scottish (strategic) Trunk Road Network. The subsequent Scottish Road Network Landslides Study identified a number of sites considered to be at highest risk. Some of these sites have been the subject of formal quantitative assessment of the risk from debris flow to mobile road users in vehicles. The A82 in Glen Coe has the added complication that two car parks have developed on debris fans exposing significant numbers of people to the risk while, they are essentially static and largely outside their vehicles. Methodology The risk to road users is determined using a previously developed probabilistic methodology for mobile road users (mobile elements at risk) and a new and related methodology developed for static road users (static elements at risk) is described and applied. Within the latter, an entirely new metric of Annual Average Daily Visits is used to allow the temporal component of the probability of a landslide impacting a person to be determined given the occurrence of an event. Results While Personal Individual Risk is at an acceptable level, including for frequent users, the risk presented to society as a whole presents a rather different picture; this is largely due to the number of visitors. The results assess the overall, societal risk for mobile elements at risk as As Low As reasonably Practicable, being at a similar level to other sites, albeit with a higher risk associated with higher numbers of fatalities. The results for the static elements at risk on the other hand suggest that the risks are classified as Unacceptable for higher numbers of fatalities. The assessment of the total societal risk, for mobile and static elements at risk, at the A82 Glen Coe suggests As Low As Reasonably Practicable for low numbers of fatalities but classify as Unacceptable for higher numbers of fatalities (around 20 to 250).

Funder

Transport Scotland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. AGS (2000) Australian geomechanics society—landslide risk management concepts and guidelines. Australian Geomech 35(1):49–92

2. AGS (2007) Australian geomechanics society—practice note guidance for landslide risk management. Aust. Geomech. 42(1):63–114

3. Ale BJM (2005) Tolerable or acceptable: a comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Risk Anal 25(2):231–241

4. Anon (2018) Great Britain tourism survey. Accessed February/March 2020. https://gbtsscotlandlightviewer.kantar.com/ViewTable.aspx.

5. Bailey EB, Maufe HB (1916) The geology of Ben Nevis and Glen Coe and the surrounding country (Explanation of Sheet 53). Memoirs of the Geological Survey, Scotland. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The John Mitchell Lecture 2023: road asset, socio-economic and fatality risk from debris flow;Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology;2024-03-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3