Abstract
Abstract
Background
Virtopsy is “a virtual alternative to the traditional autopsy, conducted with scanning and imaging technology,” mainly with the use of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT). It is still in the budding stage in India. The Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, is the first center in the country that has established a facility for virtual autopsy. This facility aims to supplement the traditional autopsy findings and also to replace/curtail internal dissection in autopsy in the future, for which there has always been an aversion in relatives of the deceased due to emotional and religious reasons. The PMCT being a noninvasive, preservative, and objective procedure would be preferred by relatives than traditional autopsy. So, in this regard, this pilot study was conducted with the objective for comparison of PMCT vs traditional autopsy findings in fatal road traffic accidents to analyze its advantages and limitations in order to replace/augment the traditional autopsy with PMCT in the near future in road traffic accident cases.
Results
The authors evaluated 10 cases of road traffic accident victims. In each case, an autopsy was preceded by a PMCT examination using a 16-slice Multi-Slice CT spiral scanner. The fractures of the skull, facial bones, clavicle, scapula, and vertebra were located more precisely as compared to traditional autopsy. Interpretation of the ventricular hemorrhages of the brain is much better in PMCT. PMCT should be the investigation of choice for pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum, pneumocephalus, and hemosiuns, while it needs further exploration to detect injuries of soft tissues as out of 14 injuries only 2 were identified by PMCT.
Conclusions
The procedure of whole-body PMCT followed by region-wise CT can be studied for a better PMCT acquisition to detect soft tissue injury findings more precisely. However, the PMCT in this study was able to conclude the cause of death in a more scientific way than the traditional autopsy.
Funder
Indian Council of Medical Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Health (social science),Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Aghayev E, Christe A, Sonnenschein M, Yen K, Jackowski C, Thali MJ et al (2008) Postmortem imaging of blunt chest trauma using CT and MRI: comparison with autopsy. J Thorac Imaging 23(1):20–27
2. Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD (2013) The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology-analysis of the literature between theyear 2000 and 2011. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 1:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2012.10.003
3. Cafarelli FP, Grilli G, Zizzo G, Giuseppe B, Giuliani N, Mahakkanukrauh P, Pinto A, Guglielmi G (2019) Post-mortem imaging: an update. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 40(1):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2018.10.012
4. Christe A, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P et al (2009) Abdominal trauma-sensitivity and specificity of postmortem noncontrast imaging findings compared with autopsy findings. J Trauma 66(5):1302–1307
5. Cittadini F, Polacco M, D’Alessio P, Tartaglione T, De Giorgio F, Oliva A et al (2010) Virtual autopsy with multidetector computed tomography of three cases of charred bodies. Med Sci Law 50(4):211–216