Novel C stain-based chemical method for differentiating real and forged fingerprints

Author:

Saharan Sameer,Yadav A. K.,Yadav Bhuvnesh

Abstract

Abstract Background Fingerprints are useful evidence for establishing identities. Development and detection of fingerprints are of immense help in criminal investigation. However, forged fingerprints identical to the real ones are emerging as a worldwide problem. Existing methods for development of fingerprints (powder method/iodine fuming method/ninhydrin test/AgNO3) fail to distinguish between real and forged fingerprints when forged fingerprints are fortified with salts and amino acids. The present study was conducted with the objective to test applicability of C stain for real and forged fingerprint differentiation. Methodology C stain was applied on real and forged fingerprints in combination with conventional methods and was evaluated on the basis of development and differentiation of real and forged fingerprints. Results The proposed technique is successful in differentiating between real and forged fingerprints. Colour difference between real and forged fingerprints was observed by taking a combination of C stain with ninhydrin, black powder and iodine fuming, one at a time. Conclusion C stain method is an effective technique for distinguishing forged fingerprints from the real ones. It works as a distinction tool even when used in combination with existing development methods.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Health(social science),Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Adamopoulos S, Oliver JV (2006) Fiber composition of packaging grade papers as determined by the Graff “C” staining test. Wood Fiber Sci 38:567–575

2. Bassam BJ, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM (1991) Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 196(1):80–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(91)90120-I

3. Bonebreak GC (1976) Fabricating fingerprint evidence. Identification News 26(10):3–13

4. Carlson M (1920) Fingerprints can be forged. Va Law Reg 5(10):765–768

5. Champod C, Espinoza M (2014) Forgeries of fingerprints in forensic science. In: Marcel S, Nixon M, Li S (eds) Handbook of biometric anti-spoofing. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, London, pp 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6524-8_2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3