Abstract
Abstract
Background
It is not straightforward to objectively evaluate the olfactory dysfunction that occurs following forensic incidents. The olfactory event-related potentials method, based on electrophysiological records, may provide objective data in the evaluation of posttraumatic anosmia cases from the medicolegal perspective. This study, where a quantitative evaluation of the cases with the complaints of olfactory sensation disorder was performed using the olfactory event-related potentials test, aims to identify the factors that should be considered in the evaluation of olfactory dysfunction from the medicolegal perspective.
Results
This study first evaluated the complaints of 98 patients admitted because of posttraumatic impaired smell and then administered electrophysiological odor tests on the patients. Because of this, the relationship between the EEG responses of the cases and the olfactory disorder was examined. Of the 98 cases that participated in the study, 68 (69.4%) were male and 30 (30.6%) were female. Of all cases, 53 (54.1%) had complaints of not being able to smell at all, 14 (14.3%) had complaints of reduced smell, whereas, in addition to the existing complaints of olfactory dysfunction, 44 (44.9%) of them had complaints of taste perception and 18 (18.3%) reported having vision disorders. 21 of 37 cases who reported being unable to smell during the test turned out to be anosmic. Furthermore, 16 cases stated that, though having had a response in the odor test, they had no sense of smell following the test.
Conclusions
Although it seems possible to prove that there is a relationship between the olfactory event-related potential test and the diagnosis of anosmia, there is still ongoing research on its use in clinical practice. Performing both subjective and electrophysiological tests together to detect olfactory dysfunctions that occur after a forensic incident enable provide more reliable results in diagnosis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Health (social science),Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference24 articles.
1. Bailie JM, Rybalsky KA, Griffith NM, Horning SM, Gesteland RC, Frank RA (2008) The susceptibility of olfactory measures to malingering. Chemosensory Percept 1(3):168–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-008-9011-7
2. Boesveldt S, Haehner A, Berendse HW, Hummel T (2007) Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 118(3):690–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.004
3. Boesveldt S, Postma EM, Boak D, Welge-Luessen A, Schöpf V, Mainland JD, Martens J, Ngai J, Duffy VB (2017) Anosmia—a clinical review. Chem Senses. 42(7):513–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx025
4. Crapser JR, Zdrubecky ML, Béland RM (2008) Systems for and methods of providing air purification in combination with odor elimination. U.S. Patent 7,368,003. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Weblink: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7368003B2/en Accessed 23 Sept. 2022
5. Güdücü C, Olcay B, Schäfer L, Aziz M, Schriever V, Özgören M et al (2019) Separating normosmic and anosmic patients based on entropy evaluation of olfactory event-related potentials. Brain Res 1708:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.12.012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献